On 16. Jan 2012, at 04:56 , Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
> bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>
>> On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>>> Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
>>> reduced transfer r
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> > Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
> > reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite
> > as one
On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
> Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
> reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite
> as one would expect. I don't have the exact figures I'm afraid as
> we just went straight back to standard
- Original Message -
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
To: "Steven Hartland"
Cc: "ml-freebsd-stable Stable"
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question
On 14. Jan 2012, at 23:56 , Steven Hartland wrote:
On a similar note I
On 14. Jan 2012, at 23:56 , Steven Hartland wrote:
> On a similar note I'm actually quite concerned by the inclusion of
> these patches by default in the OS version of ssh as we've seen
> several cases of it causing noticeable performance degradation
> instead of improvement.
>
> I've not tested
.2.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremiah Gowdy"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:30 PM
Subject: HPN-SSH question
Since it doesn't seem that the HPN-SSH patches are going to be merged upstream to OpenSSH (please correct me if I'm wrong), and
si
Since it doesn't seem that the HPN-SSH patches are going to be merged upstream
to OpenSSH (please correct me if I'm wrong), and since the HPN-SSH project
seems to be very low on resources, is the inclusion of these patches in FreeBSD
9 a commitment by FreeBSD to maintain these patches against st
