Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, this means that all the locale names are now
> consistent across -CURRENT, 4-STABLE, and the doc/ tree.
And X11. So setting, say, de_DE.ISO8859-15 will automatically
enable compose sequences for the Latin 9 characters.
--
Christia
Alexey Zelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Folks,
>
> I've just MFCed following several locale renames
>
> 1. ISO_* -> ISO*
> 2. ru_SU* -> ru_RU*
> 3. DIS_* -> ISO*-15
> 4. *.EUC -> *.euc??
> 5. *.ASCII -> *.US-ASCII
>
Is this the kind of thing you mean..
===> share/colldef
make: don't know
If memory serves me right, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> Oops, hiroo-san was already said what I have said just before:)
>
> hiroo> % or in the errata?
>
> Errata is for the post-release announcement; relnotes is better IMHO.
Right. I'm monitoring this discussion. You might not see anything
Hello, Alexey Zelkin!
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 06:31:37PM +0200, you wrote:
> I've just MFCed following several locale renames
[snip]
> 2. ru_SU* -> ru_RU*
I wonder if there are any {ru_RU|uk_UA}.CP1251 locales anywhere?
[snip]
--
NEVE-RIPE
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
hi,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 08:09:14PM +0200, Alexey Zelkin wrote:
> > What about other locales (e.g. de_DE.ISO_8859-1)? Will symlinks still
> > exist for backwards compatibility, or are the old locales being wiped
> > clean? The reason I ask is that I just did some ports patches that add
> >
