Re: HEADS UP: Plan to MFC new em driver

On 6/6/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back. I wanted a chance for any concerns to be aired before I did it, issues that anyone has had with the driver in

RE: HEADS UP: Plan to MFC new em driver

> I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT > is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back. Is something broken with TSO? I just added TSO support to bce on CURRENT and was planning on MFC'ing to RELENG_6 within the next week. Dave __

Re: HEADS UP: Plan to MFC new em driver

On 6/6/07, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT > is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back. Is something broken with TSO? I just added TSO support to bce on CURRENT and was planning on MFC'i

HEADS UP: Plan to MFC new em driver

I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back. I wanted a chance for any concerns to be aired before I did it, issues that anyone has had with the driver in CURRENT? Regards, Jack _