> Am 17.02.2018 um 10:09 schrieb Don Lewis :
>
> It is unfortunate that there don't seem to be any server-grade Ryzen
> motherboards. They all seem to be gamer boards with a lot of
> unnecessary bling.
That’s because few people use servers to build packages.
Increasingly, all the other thin
On 14 Feb, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz.
>> Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores
>> with 3.x GHz ?
>
> In my experience, "it depe
On 2/14/2018 3:15 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz.
> Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores
> with 3.x GHz ?
jail server. Lots of processes
---Mike
>
--
---
Mike
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz.
> Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores
> with 3.x GHz ?
In my experience, "it depends".
I think that above a certain numb
Hi!
> To have a bit of a work around for the Intel Meltdown bug (yes, no
> Spectre), I wanted to try out some AMD based CPUs. So far so good using
> a SuperMicro H11SSL-i. A decent server board using an Epyc CPU. All
> the things you need and expect for a server grade MB
On the plus side: 16+1
To have a bit of a work around for the Intel Meltdown bug (yes, no
Spectre), I wanted to try out some AMD based CPUs. So far so good using
a SuperMicro H11SSL-i. A decent server board using an Epyc CPU. All
the things you need and expect for a server grade MB
ipmi to provide remote management (
