Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas Laus
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: > It used to be that ports had MAKE_JOBS_SAFE in the Makefile to mark that > the port could be built using parallel compiles with the '-j' argument > to make. It appears that the logic has been switched and now you have > to mark them as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE to

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas Laus
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: > It's not a compiler flag, it's a make flag. make -j n will fork off up to > n compilers to do the build. If you just do "make buildworld" then there > is no parallel compilation. > > It used to be that ports had MAKE_JOBS_SAFE in the Makefile to mark th

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 20 September 2013 11:52, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:49:28AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: >> Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: >> > >> > When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel >> > builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Gary Palmer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:49:28AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: > Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: > > > > When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel > > builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for some ports. > > > Gary: > > I just use the system de

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas Laus
Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: > > When building kernel & world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel > builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for some ports. > Gary: I just use the system defaults when building anything. If there is a '-j' argument passed to the com

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Gary Palmer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:12:09AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: > > Tom, > > I have had multiple D510's and now D525's that are part of my test > > systems, all are 4GB machines and all run the latest (ie 2 days old) 9.X > > Stable. They're faultless. I have a D510 in production serving 30 > > users

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-20 Thread Thomas Laus
> Tom, > I have had multiple D510's and now D525's that are part of my test > systems, all are 4GB machines and all run the latest (ie 2 days old) 9.X > Stable. They're faultless. I have a D510 in production serving 30 > users - yes its a 1G system running, sendmail, squid, samba as PDC. > It's

FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

2013-09-19 Thread Thomas Laus
I have an Intel Atom D510 motherboard that is being used in my home router for the last several years. It started on FreeBSD 8-Stable and was recently upgraded to FreeBSD 9-Stable. Through the years I have observed spurious reboots when rebuilding ports, but never world or kernel. I have tried