Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-28 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100 > Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 > > ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the n

RE: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-26 Thread Helge.Oldach
Kai Lockwood <> wrote on Friday, January 26, 2007 5:10 AM: > Oliver Fromme wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> > > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel >> > > / code? >> > >> > Because it is probably unnecessary? I run a recent

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-25 Thread Kai Lockwood
This is a Firefox specific patch which requires the rtld be patched. Many thanks to those who have provided patch updates because I was at a lost without them. Oliver Fromme wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in t

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-25 Thread Firas Kraiem
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:10, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote: > Hello, > > Working setup: > - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with > rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook. > > After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel > > / code? > > Because it is probably unnecessary? I run a recent 6-STABLE and use > the flash7 plugin *without* this patch. I am using Opera, though, not > Firefox

RE: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-25 Thread Helge.Oldach
Torfinn Ingolfsen <> wrote on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:51 PM: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 > ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new >> file. > > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel >

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 > ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new > > file. > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base k

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Firas Kraiem
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:10, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote: > Hello, > > Working setup: > - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with > rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook. > > After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new > file. BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel / code? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway __

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Alexandre Vasconcelos
Tobias Roth wrote: For your convenience: http://fsck.ch/rtld_dlsym_hack_new.diff or the attached file (if it makes it through). Thank you guys, for all responses. Alex ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Tobias Roth
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:36:06 -0600 "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff > > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > >

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread ejc
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: > Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to > libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c. Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it? rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a p

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scot Hetzel wrote: > Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to > libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c. Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it? Open /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej in one

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Alexandre Vasconcelos
Scot Hetzel wrote: Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c. Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it? Thanks again, Alex ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |--- libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.orig Fri Sep 24 08:04:52 2004 |+++ libexec/rt

FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-24 Thread Alexandre Vasconcelos
Hello, Working setup: - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook. After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails: [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me.