Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org

2001-04-22 Thread Barry Lustig
Wes Peters wrote: > > The safest place in the USA, seismically speaking, is northwestern > Missouri. I don't know about their electricity politics, though, > which is rather important, too. > Hmm, Missouri doesn't sound all that safe to me. http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/states/missou

Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org

2001-04-22 Thread Wes Peters
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Donn Miller writes: > : That settles it: move the machine to Kansas or Nebraska. 8-) > > Actaully, Colorado would have better connectivity than either Kansas > or Nebraska :-) The safest place in the USA, seismically speaking, is northweste

Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org

2001-04-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Donn Miller writes: : That settles it: move the machine to Kansas or Nebraska. 8-) Actaully, Colorado would have better connectivity than either Kansas or Nebraska :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the

Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org

2001-04-20 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 3:29 PM -0700 4/20/01, David Greenman wrote: >someone wrote: > > And even in "normal" situations, it's quite hard to actually > > get all the bit's from ftp.freesoftware.com ... > >You are right that the performance has sucked generally >for awhile, however. Lightning has been bandwidth l

Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org

2001-04-20 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:19:09AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > This release candidate, which I didn't originally plan on but was > > mandated by subsequent events, should fix all the outstanding security > > issues, IPv6 installation issues, packaging issues, etc. I know of > > _NO_ outstanding pr