Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 19.03.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Eric Joyner : > I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support 100Mb > speeds. Your guess is probably correct. Going to re-wire tomorrow. Thanks, everyone. Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen -

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Eric Joyner
I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support 100Mb speeds. - Eric On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:41 AM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) > onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that > has only fast ethernet? > > status: no carrieron the host > li

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Pieper, Jeffrey E
What is the device id (pciconf -lv)? I'm pretty certain that there aren't any devices supported by ixl that are capable of 100Mb. AFAIK, the X710/X722 BASE-T devices are all 10G/1G. Jeff On 3/19/18, 8:11 AM, "owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Patrick M. Hausen" wrote: Hi all

Re: FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) > onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that > has only fast ethernet? > > status: no carrieron the host > line protocol is down (notconnect)on the switch > > dmesg: > http

FreeBSD 11.1 ixl(4) interface does not negotiate at 100 Mbit/s

2018-03-19 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4) onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that has only fast ethernet? status: no carrier on the host line protocol is down (notconnect) on the switch dmesg: https://imgur.