Hi all,
> Am 19.03.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Eric Joyner :
> I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support 100Mb
> speeds.
Your guess is probably correct. Going to re-wire tomorrow.
Thanks, everyone.
Patrick
--
punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen -
I'm guessing these are 10G copper LOMs using X722; those don't support
100Mb speeds.
- Eric
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:41 AM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)
> onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that
> has only fast ethernet?
>
> status: no carrieron the host
> li
What is the device id (pciconf -lv)? I'm pretty certain that there aren't any
devices supported by ixl that are capable of 100Mb. AFAIK, the X710/X722 BASE-T
devices are all 10G/1G.
Jeff
On 3/19/18, 8:11 AM, "owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Patrick M.
Hausen" wrote:
Hi all
Hi!
> any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)
> onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that
> has only fast ethernet?
>
> status: no carrieron the host
> line protocol is down (notconnect)on the switch
>
> dmesg:
> http
Hi all,
any ideas why a current RELENG_11_1 system with ixl(4)
onboard interfaces might not negotiate with a switch that
has only fast ethernet?
status: no carrier on the host
line protocol is down (notconnect) on the switch
dmesg:
https://imgur.