On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:36:08PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> This is a problem mlaier and I may have fixed, at least against -CURRENT.
> It appears that the process group alias in struct tty is accessed without
> locking and its changing out from under us.
>
> Give this a try:
>
> http://people
Sorry for the late reply on this.
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Ed Maste wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:54:23PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
>
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~dwhite/tty.c.20050503.patch
> >
> > This patch has been committed and exists as rev 1.228.2.4 of
> > src/sys/kern/tty.c. Please l
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:54:23PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~dwhite/tty.c.20050503.patch
>
> This patch has been committed and exists as rev 1.228.2.4 of
> src/sys/kern/tty.c. Please let me know if this fixes the panic for you,
> or causes new problems :)
For what
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Doug White wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I've taken a crack at working around the ttwwakeup() panic thats been
> reported now and again. My early analysis, based on debugging output from
> rwatson, is that a defunct struct tty gets reused without cleaning out the
> associated (stale
Hey folks,
I've taken a crack at working around the ttwwakeup() panic thats been
reported now and again. My early analysis, based on debugging output from
rwatson, is that a defunct struct tty gets reused without cleaning out the
associated (stale) knote structures, and the ttwwakeup() at the end
Hey folks,
I've taken a crack at working around the ttwwakeup() panic thats been
reported now and again. My early analysis, based on debugging output from
rwatson, is that a defunct struct tty gets reused without cleaning out the
associated (stale) knote structures, and the ttwwakeup() at the end
