Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-25 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 10:19 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > > > > I have on many occasions run into the

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Michael Proto
Michael Proto wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: >>> I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based >>> services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based >>> services. Last week rpc.lockd on one o

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > > > I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based > > > services have occupied the

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > > I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based > > services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based > > services. Last week rpc.lockd

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Michael Proto
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: >> I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based >> services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based >> services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TC

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote: > I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based > services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based > services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP > port 995, leaving in

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
Trond Endrestøl wrote: > I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based > services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based > services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP > port 995, leaving inetd unable to start any pop3s services

Re: Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-17 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Trond Endrestøl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP port 995, leavin

Ensuring inetd is started before any RPC services

2006-10-16 Thread Trond Endrestøl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP port 995, leaving inetd unable to start a