On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
Yes. The behaviour should be exactly the same as before. The only
difference is that phase 4 should run a lot faster if there are a lot of
UNREF files and directories.
'k, everything seemed to run faster except the first two, but the uptime
was only 5 days on
On 7 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
>>> a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
>>> through the patch, it seem
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
be now the n
On 6 Nov, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
> a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
> through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
> be now the norm ... after ~39minute
Well, finally had a reason to use it, and its running right now ... seems
a bit slower in phase 2 then before ... is to be expected? Looking
through the patch, it seems that all pass's were affected, so this might
be now the norm ... after ~39minutes running on a very large file system,
hittin
