Quoting Andy Kosela, who wrote on Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:41:24PM +0200 ..
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
> > to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
> > mi
u can have active/active.
Am I right?
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in
FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this envi
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
> to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
> minutes) as it tries to discover the devices. Once it is configured
> and booted, it j
have active/active.
Am I right?
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in
FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this environme
reeBSD 7-RELEASE and ZFS as the
filesystem on the SAN. ZFS is hands down better then EXT3+LVM .
Andy Kosela wrote:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
On FreeBSD7, i'm succesfully using Qlogic 4gb fibre channel HBAs (ISP
driver)
attached to Fibre Brocade Switch and IBM DS4700 (14 disks array) using 4
way multipath
with gmultipath.
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high en
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this environment to RHEL 5?
--
Andy Kosela
ora et l
