Re: can't compile kernel on STABLE

on 25/04/2010 11:37 Sandra Kachelmann said the following: > I _just_ checked out the source tree for RELENG_6 and tried to build > an image for my ALIX board: > > > $ NOCCACHE=yes KERNCONF=GENERIC TARGET_ARCH=i386 CPUTYPE=i586 make buildkernel > > ... > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/genassym.c:1: erro

Re: can't compile kernel on STABLE

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Sandra Kachelmann > wrote: >> I _just_ checked out the source tree for RELENG_6 and tried to build >> an image for my ALIX board: > > Sorry, that should read RELENG_8 Did you manually set -mpreferred-st

Re: can't compile kernel on STABLE

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > I _just_ checked out the source tree for RELENG_6 and tried to build > an image for my ALIX board: Sorry, that should read RELENG_8 Sandra ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

can't compile kernel on STABLE

I _just_ checked out the source tree for RELENG_6 and tried to build an image for my ALIX board: $ NOCCACHE=yes KERNCONF=GENERIC TARGET_ARCH=i386 CPUTYPE=i586 make buildkernel ... cc -O2 -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I/usr/src/sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm/../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm -std=gn

Compile KERNEL

I have a question about compiling the Kernel. I am using the XCP protocol from ISI for testing purposes (like TCP protocol) This protocol changes about 20 files at the system. In order to compile the new KERNEL under FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE, they provide all the files of the source of the kernel. Then

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:38:43 -0700, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> >About the only thing you should put in make.conf is the name of your >> >kernel config file: >> >KERNCONF=MY_SYS would cause the config file /sys/i386/conf/MY_SYS to be >> >used, assuming it's an i386 system.

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:48:08 -0700, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Unfortunately, I have already deleted the bounce message. I may get >another when I send this. Don't worry, I tried sending a test message from a gmail account and it bounced too. I've changed the mailbox in my addre

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:09:26 +0100, Bartosz Fabianowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Your MINIMUM_PPS file contains the entire kernel configuration and >unless you want to tweak additional options (compiler flags and >optimization settings for example), there is no need to modify make.conf. That'

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

I was just fightened by all this make.conf stuff! If everything is in my kernel file in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MINIMUM_PPS, can I just ignore make.conf? Your MINIMUM_PPS file contains the entire kernel configuration and unless you want to tweak additional options (compiler flags and optimizat

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:34:42 -0700, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Kevin, >1. Your mail address bounced my attempt at a private reply. Sorry, I don't uderstand why - it is a timelimited address that should work! but it's a facility I don't use that often I did have a look

Re: Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

> From: FreeBSD Noob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:52:45 +0100 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > As a total newbie, I am pushing my (lack of) knowledge to the limit as > a way of learning more about FreeBSD... > > I had v6.1 release installed and a custom kernel. After th

Upgrading to 6.2 stable - failed to compile kernel

Hi, As a total newbie, I am pushing my (lack of) knowledge to the limit as a way of learning more about FreeBSD... I had v6.1 release installed and a custom kernel. After the binary upgrade to v6.2, I tried to recreate the PPS kernel from updated sources, but got: | ../../../dev/mii/ip1000phy.c |

Re: compile kernel problem

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote: no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I quote it: I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook. e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in t

Re: compile kernel problem

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote: > no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I > quote it: I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook. e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in the USB mass storage devi

Re: compile kernel problem

no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I quote it: SCSI controllers. Comment out any you do not have in your system. If you have an IDE only system, you can remove these altogether. SCSI peripherals. Again, comment out any you do not have, or if you have only IDE har

Re: compile kernel problem

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote: > I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I > didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and > I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?). > But when I put a # before

Re: compile kernel problem

I just try it again cause I didn't want to annoy anybody and it worked! (?) I left the SCSI lines cause I use an iPod (and it seems to be an SCSI drive inside). I commented all the RAID lines and compilation succeeded. Now can you tell me how to be sure that my kernel conf is optimized? I attach

compile kernel problem

I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?). But when I put a # before lines I don't need like all RAID and SCSI options, kernel don't w