In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt
Heckaman writes:
: comparison to some, but I have a machine here running 512M of non-ECC for
: over a year now without any ram-related problems. (HD did die once though)
Without any ram-related problems that were detected you mean. without
ECC or parity, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
:
: Ouch. That is quite a lot of money, but then a shell server is
: usually the sort of machine that gets pounded on the worst, and in
: the worst ways -- all sorts of bizarre things that users try,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Douglas G. Allen wrote:
...
: I suggest you go look at http://www.crucial.com for memory. It's Crucial's
: website, which means it's Micron memory. I think they had 256M ECC modules
: for the PowerEdge listed for about $500 a pi
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Heckaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD-STABLE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: Compatibility Question
Matt Heckaman wrote:
&
Matt,
>Interesting, I've always personally thought ECC to be somewhat overrated
>and certaintly overpriced. Granted I do not have that much expierence in
>comparison to some, but I have a machine here running 512M of non-ECC for
>over a year now without any ram-related problems. (HD did die once
