Hello
I’ve run with this patch applied on two servers, on top of FreeBSD 10.3:
1) On a fast real server which was not experiencing the problem
(skylake+c236+nvme)
2) On a slow virtual server (ESXi 5.5, running on 6 year old hardware) which
I think
was experiencing this problem when
On 08/02/16 21:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real
world loads, are not included into the patch se
I tested the patch on a 10.3-RELEASE-p7 system and so far no problems for
last 2 days.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freeb
On 08/02/16 21:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real
world loads, are not included into the patch se
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:57:49PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 22:25 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
> > fixes from stable/10 to 10.3.
> I run 10-stable on my everyday desktop/build machine, but my mail
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:47:23PM -0700, pete wright wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2016 12:26 PM, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote:
> >
> > Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
> > fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
> > users, issues which are even t
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 22:25 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
> fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
> users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real
> world loads, are not incl
On Aug 2, 2016 12:26 PM, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote:
>
> Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
> fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
> users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real
> world loads, are not included
Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug
fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by
users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real
world loads, are not included into the patch set. The later is mostly
corrections for the handl
