On 5/22/2011 7:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote:
>
> It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal
> hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are
> the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a
> one-line hack) being bro
On May 22, 2011, at 4:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote:
>
> It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal
> hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are
> the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a
> one-line hack)
On May 22, 2011 9:38 AM, "Andriy Gapon" wrote:
> on 22/05/2011 14:58 Lars Eighner said the following:
>>
>> It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only
internal
>> hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196)
>
> What's up with the dramatic tone?
> I haven't s
on 22/05/2011 14:58 Lars Eighner said the following:
>
> It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal
> hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196)
What's up with the dramatic tone?
I haven't seen this issue being actively discussed (or being discuss
It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal
hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are
the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a
one-line hack) being brought forward?
__
