Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > dev.cpu.0.temperature: 14.0C
> > dev.cpu.1.temperature: 14.0C
> > dev.amdtemp.0.sensor0.core0: 14.0C
> > dev.amdtemp.0.sensor0.core1: 22.0C
> > dev.amdtemp.0.sensor1.core0: -49.0C
> > dev.amdtemp.0.sensor1.core1: -49.0C
> > hw.acpi.thermal.tz
05.02.2010 15:34, Oliver Fromme написав(ла):
This is a RELENG_8 box, csupped on 2010-01-22, kernel built
with amdtemp(4). It's a dual-core Athlon 64, running i386
(32bit) SMP. Excerpt from dmesg:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2009.28-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "Authe
This is a RELENG_8 box, csupped on 2010-01-22, kernel built
with amdtemp(4). It's a dual-core Athlon 64, running i386
(32bit) SMP. Excerpt from dmesg:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2009.28-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40fb2 Stepping = 2
Features
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:34:42PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
With FreeBSD 4.9 do I have to enable SMP when building the kernel to
take advantage of the dual cores in the X2?
Yes.
-- Brooks
Thanks.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain tem
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:34:42PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With FreeBSD 4.9 do I have to enable SMP when building the kernel to
> take advantage of the dual cores in the X2?
Yes.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A
Hi,
With FreeBSD 4.9 do I have to enable SMP when building the kernel to
take advantage of
the dual cores in the X2?
Thanks,
Steve
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as
George Hartzell writes:
>
> I have an Asus A8V-MX motherboard with an AMD Athlong 64 X2 3800+ CPU
> and I'm trying to run powerd to keep it cooler/quieter/greener.
> [...]
[for the archives]
I now have powerd running w/out any complaints, although I still don't
understand what was causing th
