> On 15 Jan 2019, at 14:43, Pete French wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/01/2019 10:24, Mark Blackman wrote:
>>> On 14 Jan 2019, at 18:44, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>>> haproxy does proper failover and allows custom health checks either via
>>> URL or real world traffic of external scripts. Traefik has lo
On 15/01/2019 14:48, Matt Garber wrote:
For what it’s worth, HAProxy has the PROXY protocol for exactly the scenario
you’re describing; I’ve heard it’s very straightforward and powerful to use,
although haven’t had to use it on any of my HAProxy instances which are
primarily doing L7.
http
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Pete French wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestions - unfortunately both of those (unless I
> misread them) terminate the TCP connection and make a new one to
> the backends. I was after something where I can see the original IP
> address on the socket. Though I cou
On 15/01/2019 10:24, Mark Blackman wrote:
On 14 Jan 2019, at 18:44, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
haproxy does proper failover and allows custom health checks either via
URL or real world traffic of external scripts. Traefik has lots of
container oriented features.
Dave
There’s also the very vener
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 18:44, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, at 17:15, Pete French wrote:
>> So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load
>> balancing using> relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking,
>> but I
>> upgraded> one of the firew
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, at 17:15, Pete French wrote:
> So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load
> balancing using> relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking, but
> I
> upgraded> one of the firewall pair to 12 and then discovered that the
> relayd port is> no
> Am
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 16:23, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
>
>> On 14 Jan 2019, at 16:15, Pete French wrote:
>>
>> So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load balancing using
>> relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking, but I upgraded
>> one of the firewall pair to 12
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 16:15, Pete French wrote:
>
> So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load balancing using
> relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking, but I upgraded
> one of the firewall pair to 12 and then discovered that the relayd port is
> no longer avail
So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load balancing using
relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking, but I upgraded
one of the firewall pair to 12 and then discovered that the relayd port is
no longer available.
Am now puzzling over solutions to this - I dont really
