he ICH5 ATA support in FreeBSD
> > > 10?
> > >
> > > In preparing to repurpose an elderly Dell Dimension 4600 from
> > > Windows to FreeBSD, and needing to decide what to do about
> > > drives, I found several mentions in the archives* of ICH5 ATA
>
ote:
> > Does anyone know the condition of the ICH5 ATA support in FreeBSD 10?
> >
> > In preparing to repurpose an elderly Dell Dimension 4600 from Windows
> > to FreeBSD, and needing to decide what to do about drives, I found
> > several mentions in the archives* of
> 2. Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431
> (Hans Petter Selasky)
> 3. Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431
> (Anton Shterenlikht)
> 4. Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431
> (Michael Mitchell)
> 5. R
> Does anyone know the condition of the ICH5 ATA support in FreeBSD
> 10?
> >
> > In preparing to repurpose an elderly Dell Dimension 4600 from
> Windows
> > to FreeBSD, and needing to decide what to do about drives, I found
> > several mentions in the archives* of ICH
Windows
to FreeBSD, and needing to decide what to do about drives, I found
several mentions in the archives* of ICH5 ATA DMA timeouts -- mostly
affecting the SATA ports, but the prevalence of SATA reports may
just indicate which ports were getting the most use: a couple of
the reports involved the PATA
Does anyone know the condition of the ICH5 ATA support in FreeBSD 10?
In preparing to repurpose an elderly Dell Dimension 4600 from Windows
to FreeBSD, and needing to decide what to do about drives, I found
several mentions in the archives* of ICH5 ATA DMA timeouts -- mostly
affecting the SATA
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> The best thing to do is narrow down what kernel changes caused this
> (build kernels from various cvs update dates to zero in on the cause).
I'm trying to find out more about this errors.
Today I compiled:
2005-05-27: ok, it seems (I am using it now and want to
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:58:56PM +0100, Tony Byrne wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> M> believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing
> M> firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and
> M> spit this out:
>
> M> ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086
Hello Martin,
M> believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing
M> firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and
M> spit this out:
M> ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086
Yeah, I updated and rebuilt on seeing your email, but found it did
littl
Hi (again),
believe it or not. After sending the last mail and closing
firefox, the system has been hanging for a few seconds and
spit this out:
ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=226025086
I'm back on kernel of May 26th again. This time I did not have
a corrupted file syste
Hi,
thank you, whoever fixed it and whatever it was, but -STABLE is
stable again for me. The ATA DMA timeouts have disappeared with
yesterdays kernel.
Looking at the CVS tree, I notice that there weren't many
changes to the ATA code before the problems appeared and
also when it has been
Tony Byrne wrote:
Martin,
TB> We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no sign of the ATA
TB> timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout would appear
TB> within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any changes to
TB> the ATA code in the interim so I'm curious as to what could have
T
Martin,
TB> We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no sign of the ATA
TB> timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout would appear
TB> within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any changes to
TB> the ATA code in the interim so I'm curious as to what could have
TB> caused this issue
Hello Martin,
Okay I've rolled my world and kernel back to May 8th on the RELENG_5
branch and have rebooted. We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no
sign of the ATA timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout
would appear within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any
changes t
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Tony Byrne:
> M> Affected kernel version:
> M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
>
> M> Last known working version:
> M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon May 9 00:50:46 CEST 2005
>
> This looks to be the same problem alright. Can yo
Hello Martin,
M> Affected kernel version:
M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
M> Last known working version:
M> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon May 9 00:50:46 CEST 2005
This looks to be the same problem alright. Can you confirm that the
problem goes away when you revert to the e
Hi,
I've read about some ATA DMA timeout problems recently here.
I just want to tell you, I've got same problems recently.
I had to install the kernel.old back to get rid of severe
problems.
Affected kernel version:
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue May 31 00:19:34 CEST 2005
Last known working version
17 matches
Mail list logo
