On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:42:28AM -0800, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Load average and %CPU user are right, as are other global
> statistics.
> > > The load is produced by the "7z" process (archivers/p7zip) which
> > > compresses some data in two threads but is credited with 0
> > [snip]
> >
> > Load average and %CPU user are right, as are other global
statistics.
> > The load is produced by the "7z" process (archivers/p7zip) which
> > compresses some data in two threads but is credited with 0% CPU,
though
> > its runtime is correct (increments every second as it should
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Here is what I'm seeing now:
>
>
> last pid: 70893; load averages: 1.70, 1.10, 0.58
> up
> 27+02:59:26 16:23:59
> 134 processes: 3 running, 131 sleeping
> CPU: 94.8%
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Here is what I'm seeing now:
last pid: 70893; load averages: 1.70, 1.10, 0.58
up 27+02:59:26 16:23:59
134 processes: 3 running, 131 sleeping
CPU: 94.8% user, 0.0% nice, 4.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 0.0
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Here is what I'm seeing now:
>
>
> last pid: 70893; load averages: 1.70, 1.10, 0.58
> up 27+02:59:26 16:23:59
> 134 processes: 3 running, 131 sleeping
> CPU: 94.8% user, 0.0% nice, 4.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle
> Me
Here is what I'm seeing now:
last pid: 70893; load averages: 1.70, 1.10, 0.58
up
27+02:59:26 16:23:59
134 processes: 3 running, 131 sleeping
CPU: 94.8% user, 0.0% nice, 4.6% system, 0.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 309M Active
