2009/9/28 C. C. Tang :
> C. C. Tang wrote:
>>
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
>
>>> I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
>>> installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted
>>> and
>>> the
>>> machine i
C. C. Tang wrote:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?),
rebooted and
the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
My server is up fo
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and
the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
My server is up for 3.5 days now with H
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang :
>>
>>
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and
the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
>
> My server is up for 3
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel & make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
My server is up for 3.5 days now with HyperThreading & powerd enabled.
No panic o
2009/9/19 Dan Naumov :
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang wrote:
>>> Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>>
>>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>>
>>> Attilio
>>
>> Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang wrote:
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>
>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>
>> Attilio
>
> Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
> visible in "top" as
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
visible in "top" as a result)
Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in productio
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
visible in "top" as a result)
Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in productio
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>>
>>> Attilio
>>
>> Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
>> visible in "top" as a result)
>
> Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
>
> I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in produc
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
visible in "top" as a result)
Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in production now.
But I have tested it with hyperthr
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>
> Could that one (on i386) be related?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>
I have no idea about it but I can tell the diff
2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
>>> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>
>> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
>> Jul 7 03
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
> In <3bbf2fe10907221748j7f317ce0yc13bc5d01b49...@mail.gmail.com>
> Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/23 NAKAJI Hiroyuki :
> >> In <4a667469.1080...@gmail.com>
> >> "C. C. Tang" wrote:
> >> > Could that one (on i386) be related?
> >> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ker
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 12:30:47 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
> >> Could that one (on i386) be related?
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
> >>
> >
> > I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
> > My machine panic randomly rather than on
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:24 AM, C. C. Tang wrote:
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
>>> My machine panic rand
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it
failed to write core dump. I
2009/7/23 NAKAJI Hiroyuki :
>> In <4a667469.1080...@gmail.com>
>> "C. C. Tang" wrote:
>> > Could that one (on i386) be related?
>> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>> >
>
>> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
>> My machine panic randomly rath
> In <4a667469.1080...@gmail.com>
> "C. C. Tang" wrote:
> > Could that one (on i386) be related?
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
> >
> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembere
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>> Could that one (on i386) be related?
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>
>
> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it
> failed to write core dump. It also
> Could that one (on i386) be related?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>
I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that
it failed to write core dump. It also failed to reboot automatically.
> > I hope you can get some crash dumps for the developers to look at,
> > Attilio was trying to help me but sadly the machine had to be put into
> > active use so I could no longer play with FreeBSD due to unsolved
> > instability.
>
> I want to help investigate this problem also but I remembered
> I hope you can get some crash dumps for the developers to look at,
> Attilio was trying to help me but sadly the machine had to be put into
> active use so I could no longer play with FreeBSD due to unsolved
> instability.
I want to help investigate this problem also but I remembered that the
/v
>> But is that happening at reboot time?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Attilio
>>
>
> I think I am also having similar problem on my Atom machine.
> (FreeBSD-7.2-Release-p1)
> It does not happen at boot/reboot but panic randomly.
> And I found that it remains stable for more than a month now after I
> disabled
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/8 Dan Naumov :
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds
2009/7/8 Dan Naumov :
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsna
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
"portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>>
>>> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>
>> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
>> Jul 7 03:49
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
"portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
1) held by 0xff00017d8370 (
34 matches
Mail list logo
