This is a really old thread i thought i would bring back to life. I have heard
that the flash card vendor has fessed up to a problem and said there is a
software fix they can create. So far i have no ETA on when that is going to
happen and for the record i don't think i will.
Oh well... here c
't come to that.
Thanks for the reply!
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:18:28
To: john fleming
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.2-Release ..ish.. CF + ata == freeze?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:43:08PM -0800
rry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:18:28
To: john fleming
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.2-Release ..ish.. CF + ata == freeze?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:43:08PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
> Just thought i would post over he
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 00:12 -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:43:08PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
> > Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
> > checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a
> > large install
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:38:06PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:43 PM, john fleming wrote:
>
> > Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
> > checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a
> > large install b
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:43 PM, john fleming wrote:
> Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
> checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a
> large install base of IPSO checkpoint firewalls, which are based on FreeBSD
> 6.2. I've had
I can't seem to replicate it at all. I've seen it happen on 3 different IPSO
boxes so far. The last machine it happened on is maybe 4 months old. Basically
on all 3 machines once rebooted the problem doesn't come back. Checkpoint so
far is telling me its a known issue and they don't know what th
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:43:08PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
> Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
> checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a
> large install base of IPSO checkpoint firewalls, which are based on FreeBSD
> 6.2.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:43:08PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
> Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
> checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a
> large install base of IPSO checkpoint firewalls, which are based on FreeBSD
> 6.
Just thought i would post over here as i'm not getting a warm fuzzy from
checkpoint about being able to find the root cause of an issue. I have a large
install base of IPSO checkpoint firewalls, which are based on FreeBSD 6.2. I've
had 3 firewalls hang basically the same way, with something that
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 4:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
> launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows
>
> cluster-one
6.2 is really quite old now, does 7.x or even 8.x work?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Povolotsky"
I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mpt
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:40:41PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
>#7 0x802af5e3 in _sx_xlock (sx=0x802b02bd, file=0x4
>, line=-2140937936)
>at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:192
>192 }
Well, the file and line are nonsense.
>#17 0x802b845e in umtx_key_get (td=0xff0
Server keeps crashing, I maged to have a new coredump that should be
reliable this time.
Here is the debugging of the kernel ... i'm not really an expert in this
topic so if you need any more information just let me know and i will do my
best to provide it.
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mod
, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Primeroz lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or
> > 2).
> >
> > FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5
- "Primeroz lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or
> 2).
>
> FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5 , AMD64. 2xXeon QuadCore and 8G of Ram.
>
> MySQL Version is 5.0.41 with fo
I have a 6.1-release machine that I wanted to upgrade, so I decided I would
upgrade to 6.2-rel, and then to 7-pre.
When I upgraded to 6.2-rel, it fails at mountroot, claiming that it can't
find ad0s1a to boot from. (Entering ? to list all available boot devices
only lists acd0 and ad2*, which
Primeroz lists wrote:
Hi all,
we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or 2).
FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5 , AMD64. 2xXeon QuadCore and 8G of Ram.
$ sudo kgdb /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PE2950/kernel.debug vmcore.2
This back trace will be useless, I rebuilt
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:35:13PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
>>
>> The vm_map.c does not contain a call to the vm_map_unlock() at the
>> line 3074.
>>
>
>Mine does ... is Revision *1.366.2.3 *on Freebsd CVS for vm_map.c , CVS TAG
>RELENG_6_2
Not according to either the kgdb output you included
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:04:19AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>But the process that's inducing the panic *every time* is mysqld; this
>you've already confirmed. To me this means that mysqld is responsible
>for tickling some sort of condition that causes a panic; it could be the
>fault of mysqld
>
> The vm_map.c does not contain a call to the vm_map_unlock() at the
> line 3074.
>
Mine does ... is Revision *1.366.2.3 *on Freebsd CVS for vm_map.c , CVS TAG
RELENG_6_2
Please, rebuild you kernel from scratch. In case this does not help,
> I ask you to show the backtrace from the ddb. Also
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:50:32PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or 2).
>
> FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5 , AMD64. 2xXeon QuadCore and 8G of Ram.
>
> MySQL Version is 5.0.41 with following c
>
> We use mysql-server-5.0.45 (fairly old, since newest is 5.0.51a); yours
> is a bit older. I'll have to look at the ChangeLog between 5.0.41 and
> 5.0.51a to see if there's any relevant changes which might give hints to
> what's causing it.
>
> I don't see any changes relevant between 5.0.41 an
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:19:05PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
> We using the 4bsd Scheduler (ULE is commented out in kernel conf)
That's good, as it confirms you're not hitting ULE bugs.
> > 3) Your kernel configuration in its entirity, if possible :-)
>
> attached
I don't see anything in you
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:50:09PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
> Just wanted to point out that anyway our crash is a Kernel panic crash and
> not a Mysqld crash.
But the process that's inducing the panic *every time* is mysqld; this
you've already confirmed. To me this means that mysqld is respo
Just wanted to point out that anyway our crash is a Kernel panic crash and
not a Mysqld crash.
Platform is AMD64 so , i'm don't think it can be a problem of process size :
> $ sudo -u mysql limits
Resource limits (current):
cputime infinity secs
filesize infinity kB
datasiz
>
>
>
> There's additional information needed to help with this:
>
> 1) Contents of /boot/loader.conf
empty
>
> 2) What scheduler you're using in your kernel configuration
We using the 4bsd Scheduler (ULE is commented out in kernel conf)
> 3) Your kernel configuration in its entirity, if po
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:50:32PM +, Primeroz lists wrote:
> we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or 2).
>
> FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5 , AMD64. 2xXeon QuadCore and 8G of Ram.
> MySQL Version is 5.0.41 with following configuration settings:
>
Hi all,
we are experiencing repeated crash on a Dell PowerEdge 2950 (rev 1 or 2).
FBSD release is 6.2-RELEASE-p5 , AMD64. 2xXeon QuadCore and 8G of Ram.
MySQL Version is 5.0.41 with following configuration settings:
set-variable= key_buffer=768M
set-variable= table_cache=800
set
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:23:52PM +1100, Geoff Roberts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems you can't recursively use the "include" rule specification
> with devfs in Freebsd 6.2. I couldn't see a note about this in the
> devfs man page so I'm not sure whether this is expected behaviour or
> not.
The manpa
Hi,
It seems you can't recursively use the "include" rule specification with devfs
in Freebsd 6.2. I couldn't see a note about this in the devfs man page so I'm
not sure whether this is expected behaviour or not.
For example, the devfsrules_jail is defined as the following
in /etc/defaults/dev
Unga wrote:
>
> Mine is also an ATI Radeon card:
> ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] rev 1
> Chipset ATI Radeon 9200PRO 5960 (AGP)
>
> I cannot ssh to the machine while its freezes. It says
> 'no route to host'. That is, the machine is completely
> dead.
>
> The other thing is, FreeB
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Unga wrote:
> > > > > Hi all
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4
> 3.0GHz,
> > > > > 512MB Ram computer.
> > > > >
> >
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:37:05AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
...
> > Can you verify that the machine is actually dead? Do you have another
> > machine that you can hook up either to a serial console, or ssh into the
> > dead box? Weird X symptoms could lead to an unresponsive keyboard, with
> > t
> From: Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:42:35 +
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 03:28 -0800, Unga wrote:
> > --- Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Unga wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 03:28 -0800, Unga wrote:
> --- Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Unga wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz,
> > > 512MB Ram computer.
> > >
>
--- Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unga wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz,
> > 512MB Ram computer.
> >
> > Its very irritatingly hangs very frequently, more
> than
> > 10 times a
On Nov 28, 2007 5:15 PM, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 10 times a day. Do others find FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
> always hangs?
no
> coincidental. How do I find why it hangs?
hardware problem, i suppose.
broken cpu fan?
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http
Hi,
Unga wrote:
Hi all
I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz,
512MB Ram computer.
Its very irritatingly hangs very frequently, more than
10 times a day. Do others find FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
always hangs? I simply cannot use it for any serious
use, not even to send a mail, other
Unga wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz,
> 512MB Ram computer.
>
> Its very irritatingly hangs very frequently, more than
> 10 times a day. Do others find FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
> always hangs? I simply cannot use it for any serious
&
Hi all
I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz,
512MB Ram computer.
Its very irritatingly hangs very frequently, more than
10 times a day. Do others find FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
always hangs? I simply cannot use it for any serious
use, not even to send a mail, other than browsing we
bad -- thanks for the
information. I'll likely need this at some point.
Unfortunately I did not have the luxury to embroil myself in debug hell
with this problem since this is my mail/web machine and others depend on
it. I can tolerate some downtime, but this was just getting to be too
Hi,
I just csup'd the sources a few hours ago, and successfully compiled and
installed a new kernel. However, when I go to do a buildworld, this
comes up:
--
>>> stage 2.3: build tools
---
Quoting Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Nov 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Any chance you could post some of these error messages? And if possible,
backtraces, etc?
The messages amounted to page fault while in kernel mode or similar. The
problem is the system attempts to reboot itself within
On Nov 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Any chance you could post some of these error messages? And if possible,
> backtraces, etc?
The messages amounted to page fault while in kernel mode or similar. The
problem is the system attempts to reboot itself within 15 seconds. I know
there is a way to pos
Clint Olsen wrote:
I attempted to just do a binary upgrade, assuming that I botched the source
upgrade somehow. After installing FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, I was left with a
system that would not boot (similar errors on boot as before).
Any chance you could post some of these error messages? And
On Nov 11, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> That's strange, I've gone right from 5.3 through to RELENG_7 without ever
> doing the reboots during the install process (I know that's not
> recommended) and I never ran into trouble. Did you accidently turn off
> compat6x in the kernel before you built? Did your
t; with a system that can not run with your old kernel. So better backup
>> before you try.
>
> I attempted to just do a binary upgrade, assuming that I botched the source
> upgrade somehow. After installing FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, I was left with a
> system that would not boot (similar
ore you try.
I attempted to just do a binary upgrade, assuming that I botched the source
upgrade somehow. After installing FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, I was left with a
system that would not boot (similar errors on boot as before). Reverting
the kernel of course was of limited help because userland was all e
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 04:57:07PM +0300, ?? wrote:
> So I have southbridge VT8237A and two(!) HDDs attached to SATA chanels of
> this
> controller. I Prefer to have RAID on it.
> When I install FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (from floppies) it`s detected only one HDD
> and
>
So I have southbridge VT8237A and two(!) HDDs attached to SATA chanels of this
controller. I Prefer to have RAID on it.
When I install FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (from floppies) it`s detected only one HDD
and
write that my RAID storage DEGRADED... I think that it is a bug in the kernel.
I`m right
I realize now that I need to explain doing this.
I just did a checkin that will allow the latest em code
to work on 6.2, BUT, it will NOT work integrated into
the RELEASE kernel tree, and I am not going to
support that :) To do that would mean changing
conf/files and so forth.
Therefore, if you w
On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put
> > > into ST
On 10/11/07, David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put
> > into STABLE on 6.2 RELEASE.
> >
> > Right now it won't compile, this i
On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put
> into STABLE on 6.2 RELEASE.
>
> Right now it won't compile, this is because I put the MSI/X support
> in the clear, figuring 'well, this i
I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put
into STABLE on 6.2 RELEASE.
Right now it won't compile, this is because I put the MSI/X support
in the clear, figuring 'well, this is STABLE so why should I #ifdef :)'.
I should have known better, and of course
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:55:08PM -0500, Natham wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Im getting a Fatal trap 12 from a freebsd 6.2 release p7, how can i
> report it and get help??
Check
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
on how to obtain needed
Hi:
Im getting a Fatal trap 12 from a freebsd 6.2 release p7, how can i
report it and get help??
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel:
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel:
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
pfw: xx
---
uname -a
FreeBSD x.x.x 6.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr 26 17:55:55
UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP
i386
---
cat /etc/rc.conf
defaultrouter="x.x.x.x"
font8x14="cp865-8x14"
font8x16="cp865-8x16"
font
I found the problem here. At some point in the past a rowless-RRA was
added to the files handled by this one process. I have no idea why it
only showed up after the reboot, but it's unrelated to FreeBSD anyway.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Last night I ran "freebs
Last night I ran "freebsd-update install" and rebooted. Even thought
the update said -p6, when it rebooted uname -s continues to reboot -
p4 on all systems.
However, since the reboot rrdtool is dumping core periodically. It
doesn't happen on non-updated systems. I've deinstalled and rebuil
y sysctl, and test, cleared my firewall and test, re-build my
kernel with any options changed and test again.. Just don't Work :((
I have use PF firewall and FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5.
I Think this problem is from "net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2" in my sysctl because
it's work before i do sysct
ExTaZyTi wrote:
Hi,
My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error
===> bin (install)
===> bin/cat (install)
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin
strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted
install: wait: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 70
Stop in
I do chflags noschg /bin and its work :)
2007/6/15, ExTaZyTi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
kern.securelevel: -1 and the permessions on /bin and / is the correct :[
2007/6/15, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote:
> > My problem is with the
kern.securelevel: -1 and the permessions on /bin and / is the correct :[
2007/6/15, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote:
> My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the
error
>
> ===> bin (install)
> ===> bin/
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote:
> My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error
>
> ===> bin (install)
> ===> bin/cat (install)
> install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin
> strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted
> install: w
Hi,
My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error
===> bin (install)
===> bin/cat (install)
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin
strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted
install: wait: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 70
Stop in /usr/src/bin/cat
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 03:20:05 pm Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
> >
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows
cluster-one# mptable -verbose
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable
shows
Hmm. I am running PentiumD 3.0 Ghz on Asus p5p800-vm
motherboard
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
> launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows
>
> cluster-one
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
> launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows
Hyperthreading is disabled by default in FreeBSD (for
security reasons). You can enable it via sysctl if
yo
Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.
mptable still shows ONE CPU
Alex.
Full dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights r
please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope
2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>>> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
>>> From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sender: [EMAIL P
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and what is this, i mean why:
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
WARNING:
Hello!
I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows
cluster-one# mptable -verbose
===
MPTable
looking for EBDA pointer
The server has two CPUs. The only special thing
is that with the current BIOS ACPI is broken.
--
Martin
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 23 11:13:16 CET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (
Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
Just got this panic on a loaded mailserver ... The server was rocking
stable
up to this panic, and after we loaded it a bit more recently, it paniced.
Any ideas ?
Can you post your kernel configuration file?
Alan
___
f
Hi,
Just got this panic on a loaded mailserver ... The server was rocking stable
up to this panic, and after we loaded it a bit more recently, it paniced.
Any ideas ?
--
Martin
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc067550a in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:409
#2 0xc0675
, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec r
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
> > From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > and what is this, i mean why:
> > WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
> > WARNING
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
> From: "Alexey Karagodov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> and what is this, i mean why:
> WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
> WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
I thought it wa
eduler use only one.
(from dmesg)
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.2-R
, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet force
University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack
reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D
WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance
We have been having rampant issues using Dummynet's IPv6 support, and
it's been causing panic's every 24-48 hours.
Enabled WITNESS and BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER, and this is the result.
-=-
lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable)
1st 0xff034809c900 rtentry (rtentry) @
/usr/src/sys/netin
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
> Not use kernel ppp, which is known to be broken. I don't know what
> this means for your application.
Sorry to hijack this thread but is there any way to mimic the following
pppd invocation with mpd or ppp(8) :
/usr/sbin/pppd 192.168.0.15:192.1
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:25:44PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got these repeatable crashes with:
>
> klon# uname -a
> FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7:
> Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007
> [EMAIL PROTECT
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello,
I've got these repeatable crashes with:
klon# uname -a
FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7:
Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i386
the system is running quagga and l2tpd built fro
Hello,
I've got these repeatable crashes with:
klon# uname -a
FreeBSD klon.klsp.kharkov.ua 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #7:
Fri Mar 23 11:26:01 EET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KLON i386
the system is running quagga and l2tpd built from the yesterday'
LI Xin wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > LI Xin wrote:
> > > I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> > > should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
> >
> > Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
> > any includes into account.
> >
> > It was ver
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
> > I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> > should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
>
> Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
> any includes into account.
>
> It was very annoying to discover that INCLUDE_CON
LI Xin wrote:
> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
any includes into account.
It was very annoying to discover that INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
gave me only two lines for o
> regression that was introduced late in the 6.2 release cycle. I'm
> personally pretty skeptical that this could cause a problem, although
> I'm admittedly a little biased, plus there weren't a lot of details in
> your email as to what the problem is.
Well, you are
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:23:53PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
[..]
> >> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> >> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
> >
> > I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
> > also s
On Mar 19, 2007, at 9:24 AM, LI Xin wrote:
I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
ew yucky
What I do is keep my kernel configs in subversion. I have a "common"
component which applies to all systems under my control,
these that touched the
kernel was FreeBSD-EN-07:02.net, which backed out an IPv6-related
regression that was introduced late in the 6.2 release cycle. I'm
personally pretty skeptical that this could cause a problem, although
I'm admittedly a little biased, plus there weren't a lot o
- Original Message -
From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, it does. You get full configuration file from sysctl(8) or from
config -k , and config(8) is modified in a way, that lets you to
use this file without additional trimming.
Sounds like a very worth while addition,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:32:48PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
> >also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
>
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
