Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: > Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its > daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days. > > Stack trace is here: > > > > Looks file system

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:46:49AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kostik > Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: > >>Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its > >>daily update o

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:19:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:46:49AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: > > Index: mount.h > === > RCS file: /usr/local/arch/ncvs/src/sys/sys/mount.h,v > retrieving revision 1.21

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Thank you for the data. As I see, the problem could be worked around by the following patch: [snip] I'll try loading this on my box later today. Thank you!! What seems to be quite untrivial is testing. Quite! Did

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days. Stack trace is here:

6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days. Stack trace is here: Looks file system related to me. Any advice appreciated. Cheers, -- Mark A. R. Knight