Re: 6.1-BETA4 installation report

2006-03-19 Thread Martin Jackson
Sam Leffler wrote: Martin Jackson wrote: 1) The upgrade errored out almost immediately on /var/empty, since it had been chflags'ed to nschg. I went to the shell and chflags'ed that off, and upgrade continued. It's supposed to be that way, so something is wrong if this is causing problems :(

Re: 6.1-BETA4 installation report

2006-03-19 Thread Sam Leffler
Martin Jackson wrote: 1) The upgrade errored out almost immediately on /var/empty, since it had been chflags'ed to nschg. I went to the shell and chflags'ed that off, and upgrade continued. It's supposed to be that way, so something is wrong if this is causing problems :( Agreed. :) Looki

Re: 6.1-BETA4 installation report

2006-03-19 Thread Martin Jackson
1) The upgrade errored out almost immediately on /var/empty, since it had been chflags'ed to nschg. I went to the shell and chflags'ed that off, and upgrade continued. It's supposed to be that way, so something is wrong if this is causing problems :( Agreed. :) Looking through the source t

Re: 6.1-BETA4 installation report

2006-03-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 02:39:00PM -0600, Martin Jackson wrote: > Greetings, > > First of all, thanks for all the hard work that's gone into the 6.1 > release process so far. > > Today, I tried doing a binary upgrade of 6.1-PRERELEASE (cvsup'ed about > a week ago) to 6.1-BETA4. It's really old

6.1-BETA4 installation report

2006-03-19 Thread Martin Jackson
Greetings, First of all, thanks for all the hard work that's gone into the 6.1 release process so far. Today, I tried doing a binary upgrade of 6.1-PRERELEASE (cvsup'ed about a week ago) to 6.1-BETA4. It's really old hardware, a PII 333Mhz. I don't know if what I tried to do is even suppor