Re: 5.3-STABLE failing to read 4.x-Stable hdd

2005-01-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, 2005-Jan-08 16:58:10 +1000, Warren wrote: >> I didn't suggest you trash it I just want to know if it was setup as >> dangerously dedicated, and what the output of the fdisk command on both >> drives is.. > >Soz mis understood.. Try running disklabel on ad0s1 and ad1s1. Slice numbers shoul

Re: 5.3-STABLE failing to read 4.x-Stable hdd

2005-01-08 Thread Warren
> I didn't suggest you trash it I just want to know if it was setup as > dangerously dedicated, and what the output of the fdisk command on both > drives is.. Soz mis understood.. *** Working on device /dev/ad0 *** parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=232581 heads=16

Re: 5.3-STABLE failing to read 4.x-Stable hdd

2005-01-08 Thread Warren
> What about fdisk? > Is the 4.x one dangerously dedicated? I have a lot of data on the ad1 hdd from webpages i was hosting .. admittedly i got most backed up .. but there was a lot of other important data i cant re-retrieve without severe cost to myself which id rather very much not have to do