Hello,
Le 27 Dec 01 à 22:06:56 +, Matthew Dillon écrivait :
> That's a fairly heavy-weight combination. Probably one of the
> programs went on an infinite memory-allocation loop or something
> like that.
>
> One solution is to set a datasize limit in your .xinitrc or .xsess
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:30:20PM -0800, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2001, at 19:56, William Carrel boldly uttered:
>> Using switch settings to obtain this sort of configuration/protection is
>> at best crude. Try dummynet(4) and/or some QoS capable network
>> hardware.
>
> The swi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allen Landsidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
>
At 02:22 PM 12/26/2001 -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
>Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that
>auto-sensing/auto-negotiating must be enabled on both sides for the feature
>to work a bit strange?
You can't just put that slash there and treat the two things the same
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:22:15PM -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that
> auto-sensing/auto-negotiating must be enabled on both sides for the feature
> to work a bit strange?
>
> At home, I have a Netgear FS116, a 16-Port unmanage
;
To: "Allen Landsidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
> Well, having followed this thread for some bit, I gotta throw my $.02
> worth in..
Well, having followed this thread for some bit, I gotta throw my $.02
worth in.. I'm one of those who has machines connected via a "dumb"
10baseT hub, and auto everything doesn't work. I think the whole point
is that a certain amount of knowledge is required *before* one should
attempt to build a
i would like to get my notebook,which hangs on boot (pcic), to run again
with freebsd. was there any recent changes or any hints how i could get
around that problem? (the problem was posted with KAPOK in the subject).
--
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Karl M. Joch
To Unsubscribe
PROTECTED]>; "Nevermind"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Murray Stokely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
> I ap
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Peter Ong wrote:
> I apologize if I'm off. But it seems you guys are talking about
> improving FBSD 4.5 networking performance.
>
> I am currently using FreeBSD 4.4 Release. It works great, but there is
> that one problem Samba. I like Samba because it's functional. I don
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing
>
> I apologize if I'm off. But it seems you guys are talking about improving
> FBSD 4.5 networking performance.
>
Ooc, are you using samba 2.2.1 or 2.2.2+? There were oplock problems with the
2
I watch. I can't watch it over the wire.
> >
> > This is just my two cents. Maybe 5 cents. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTEC
and Real movie files, that I must first
> download, and then I watch. I can't watch it over the wire.
>
> This is just my two cents. Maybe 5 cents. Thanks.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Nevermind&quo
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Murray Stokely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 2
14 matches
Mail list logo
