Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken

2004-08-12 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:57:31 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote: > Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6 > packet too big packets are sent. Sorry, I made a mistake. I did not set net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 on the test machine. Now I have and now I get "packet too big" icmp6

Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken

2004-08-12 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:01:56 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote: > So, maybe something changed getween July 17th and now. I will > see what happens after an upgrade to the latest 4.10. Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6 packet too big packets are sent. rvdp

Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken

2004-08-12 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > Is this a known issue? > Do you need more information? I have tried it on 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #8: Sat Jul 17 10:08:52 CEST 2004 It sends "Packet too big" icmp6s on the wire. I also see the netstat -s -p icmp6 "

Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken

2004-08-12 Thread Ronald van der Pol
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > The box does not appear to be generating a ICMP6 too big error > message which I would expect to see once the 1428 octet TCP > segments start arriving. You could also check the output of: netstat -s -p icmp6 There ha

4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken

2004-08-11 Thread Mark Andrews
I have a 4.10 stable box updated around August 1. It was previously running 4.9-pre and was working fine. It has the following interface configuration. tx0 is internal, sis0 is external. The gif0 interface is providing external IPv6 connectivity. tx0: f