eebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p16 on ESX Server 2.5.1
vmware's virtual implementation of acpi collides with freebsd. best
practice is to disable acpi altogether in the actual config file on
the host o/s for the VM by manually placing:
acpi.present = "false"
m
vmware's virtual implementation of acpi collides with freebsd. best
practice is to disable acpi altogether in the actual config file on
the host o/s for the VM by manually placing:
acpi.present = "false"
monitor_control.disable_apic = "TRUE"
in the whatever.vmx config file, and restarting t
I'm having a problem with my FreeBSD virtual machines on the production HP
DL360 G4p servers we are using. In test I used a weaker ESX box and never
had the issue. The problem is when rebooting the virtual machine it will
sometimes hang at "Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". This
n
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-23 16:10:03 +0200:
> I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
> that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
> happened to /dev/dsp, and I can no longer play mp3s. A restart would
> most probably fix it, but
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-24 21:27:19 +0200:
> On Mon, 23.05.2005 at 16:10:03 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
> > that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
> > happened to /
On Mon, 23.05.2005 at 16:10:03 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
> that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
> happened to /dev/dsp, and I can no longer play mp3s. A restart would
> most probably
Hello,
I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 i386 (450MHz P3/Celeron)
that has been running just fine, but after ~ 120 days something
happened to /dev/dsp, and I can no longer play mp3s. A restart would
most probably fix it, but I'd like to know if it's possible to determine
(an
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> On 11/3/2004 7:15 PM Doug White wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Can someone please tell me what the aic_recovery process is in my ps
> >>-acux output? Maybe if I can read about this, I can figure out where my
> >>wh
On 11/3/2004 7:15 PM Doug White wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Can someone please tell me what the aic_recovery process is in my ps
-acux output? Maybe if I can read about this, I can figure out where my
whole problem lies. My original post is below.
They're kernel threa
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> Can someone please tell me what the aic_recovery process is in my ps
> -acux output? Maybe if I can read about this, I can figure out where my
> whole problem lies. My original post is below.
They're kernel threads used for handling errors on Adaptec
On 11/3/2004 4:16 PM Vivek Khera wrote:
On Nov 3, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
So, does shutdown complete on your system? I don't know if you read
this thread or not but I'm experiencing the same symptoms.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-December/
016933.html
On Nov 3, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
So, does shutdown complete on your system? I don't know if you read
this thread or not but I'm experiencing the same symptoms.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-December/
016933.html
I have no shutdown issues on any system
On 11/3/2004 12:52 PM Vivek Khera wrote:
On Nov 3, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Can someone please tell me what the aic_recovery process is in my ps
-acux output? Maybe if I can read about this, I can figure out where
my whole problem lies. My original post is below.
I'm not sure ex
On Nov 3, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Can someone please tell me what the aic_recovery process is in my ps
-acux output? Maybe if I can read about this, I can figure out where
my whole problem lies. My original post is below.
I'm not sure exactly what they are for, but they exist o
since April 2004. Over the
weekend, I decided to upgrade to 4.10-RELEASE-p3 to fix the pthreads
problem since I had just added an external tape drive to the QLogic
SCSI card that was already in my system.
Anyway, after upgrading, I experienced the same symptoms as described
in this message:
I've been happily using 4.9-RELEASE-p4 since April 2004. Over the
weekend, I decided to upgrade to 4.10-RELEASE-p3 to fix the pthreads
problem since I had just added an external tape drive to the QLogic SCSI
card that was already in my system.
Anyway, after upgrading, I experienced the
Hi,
on a Dell gx270 512m of ram, 40 gig hd, 3ghz P4,
em0: >> stage 2: build tools
--
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj DESTDIR= INSTALL="sh
/usr/src/tools/install.sh" make -f Makefile.inc1 -DBOOTSTRAPPING build-tools
echo "===> b
I've just installed 4.10-RELEASE onto a Compaq DeskPro/EP and had
sysinstall hang in the "probing devices" step. I traced this down to
a Kouwell 223NP-4 PCI I/O card (4 serial, 1 parallel port using a
NetMos Nm9845CV chip) - when I unplugged the card, the install works
perfect
n Alexander aka BlackSir
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexandr Kovalenko
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 4.10-RELEASE miniinst does not fit on 3&
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 20:47, Lou Katz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 12:43:00PM +0300, Gilad Rom wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 12:32, Colin Percival wrote:
> > > At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > >miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the
> >
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 12:43:00PM +0300, Gilad Rom wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 12:32, Colin Percival wrote:
> > At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > >miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the
> > >full disk.
> > >
> > >Would be nice to shave that 8M
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 12:32, Colin Percival wrote:
> At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the
> >full disk.
> >
> >Would be nice to shave that 8Mb off though :)
>
> No it wouldn't. If we make it fit now, then we'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:02, Colin Percival wrote:
> At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the
> >full disk.
> >
> >Would be nice to shave that 8Mb off though :)
>
> No i
At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the
>full disk.
>
>Would be nice to shave that 8Mb off though :)
No it wouldn't. If we make it fit now, then we'll be struggling to
make it continue to fit for years into the fu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:07, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> Maybe I'm not right, but 4.10-RELEASE-i386-miniinst.iso does not fit on
> my 3" CD-R :(
>
> It is 210Mb and image is 218Mb...
miniinst isn't meant for small CD'
Maybe I'm not right, but 4.10-RELEASE-i386-miniinst.iso does not fit on
my 3" CD-R :(
It is 210Mb and image is 218Mb...
--
NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food
Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group
http://uafug.org.ua/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
e in my hardware and I want to
populate my jails with a tagged release...
- Mike H.
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 22:08:10 +0200
From: Ivo Schmagler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mvh.mine.nu
Hi,
Hi,
I just wonder what happened to 4.10-RELEASE. Heard rumors about RC3 being
planned, but seems to be wrong. According to webpage release is still
scheduled for May 5th (?) ... Anybody else who wonders what's going on?
When will it be released? I can't
28 matches
Mail list logo
