Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP)

1999-12-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 27-Dec-99 Chris Malayter wrote: > Along this line of problems, > > I am having serious problems compileing a usable apache binary when > compileing modphp with IMAP support. It works fine for me when I just > compile any other service or combination of services. > > Here's the error: > >

Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP)

1999-12-27 Thread Tom
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: ... > What's the magic and why doesn't the port know it? Why is -lc even in > play if some of the components (-lmysqlclient) require -lc_r? Yours, libmysqlclient does not require -lc_r, because the library does not use threads. Only mysqld is th

Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP)

1999-12-27 Thread Chris Malayter
Along this line of problems, I am having serious problems compileing a usable apache binary when compileing modphp with IMAP support. It works fine for me when I just compile any other service or combination of services. Here's the error: Configuring for Apache, Version 1.3.9 + using instal

Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP)

1999-12-27 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Tom once stated: => => What's the magic and why doesn't the port know it? Why is -lc even => => in play if some of the components (-lmysqlclient) require -lc_r? => => Yours, => = => = libmysqlclient does not require -lc_r, because the library does => =not use threads. Only mysqld is threade

Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP)

1999-12-27 Thread Tom
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Tom once stated: > > =On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = > =... > => What's the magic and why doesn't the port know it? Why is -lc even in > => play if some of the components (-lmysqlclient) require -lc_r? Yours, > = > = libmysqlclient