On 2/17/21 22:57, Xin Li wrote:
> On 2/17/21 22:35, Kristof Provost wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
>> b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
>> following ru
On 2/17/21 22:35, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
> b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
> following rule:
>
> block in quick proto tcp f
On 18 Feb 2021, at 6:01, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
following rule:
block in quick proto tcp from any os "Linux" to any port ssh
would get interpreted as:
block drop in q
Hi,
It appears that some change between 939430f2377 (December 31) and
b4bf7bdeb70 (today) on stable/12 have broken pf in a way that the
following rule:
block in quick proto tcp from any os "Linux" to any port ssh
would get interpreted as:
block drop in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 22
