Mornin',
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:23:15PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Instead of asking all of the questions on a list, why not just direct
> people to input information via a webpage? Seems to be a bit more effective
> / less traffic than posting results to multiple lists..
Instead
Andreas Pettersson wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
1. What is more important to your personal use of FreeBSD (the ports
system, the underlaying OS, some other aspect)?
2. How frequently do you interact with the ports systems and what is
the most common interaction you have with it?
Por
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Repost from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the f
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> [Repost from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
> least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
> remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the future (estimates
> if and when needed v
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
1. What is more important to your personal use of FreeBSD (the ports
system, the underlaying OS, some other aspect)?
2. How frequently do you interact with the ports systems and what is
the most common interaction you have with it?
Portupgrade a few times a mont
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> 1. What is more important to your personal use of FreeBSD (the ports
> system, the underlaying OS, some other aspect)?
Yes. (i.e., mu)
> 2. How frequently do you interact with the ports systems and what is
> the most common int
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Repost from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>
> 7. Same as question 6 but for your answer on question 3?
This should read:
7. If the new system corrected the worst aspect of the current system
but broke the best aspect of it would you use the new system?
- --
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Syste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Repost from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the future (estimates
if and whe
