Re: [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing

Tim Howe wrote: Tim Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ata0-master: stat=0xd0 err=0xd0 lsb=0xd0 msb=0xd0 This turned out to be the key. Version 1.51 of ata-lowlevel.c added a check for stat0/1, err, lsb, and I am just wondering about this. As far as I can tell, I have the ata-lowlevel.c f

Re: [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing

Tim Howe wrote: Tim Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ata0-master: stat=0xd0 err=0xd0 lsb=0xd0 msb=0xd0 This turned out to be the key. Version 1.51 of ata-lowlevel.c added a check for stat0/1, err, lsb, and msb being identical. If they are, it aborts the probe. The attached patch creates

Re: [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing

Tim Howe wrote: Tim Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ata0-master: stat=0xd0 err=0xd0 lsb=0xd0 msb=0xd0 This turned out to be the key. Version 1.51 of ata-lowlevel.c added a check for stat0/1, err, lsb, and msb being identical. If they are, it aborts the probe. The attached See a

[PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing (was: 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2))

Tim Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ata0-master: stat=0xd0 err=0xd0 lsb=0xd0 msb=0xd0 This turned out to be the key. Version 1.51 of ata-lowlevel.c added a check for stat0/1, err, lsb, and msb being identical. If they are, it aborts the probe. The attached patch creates an option ATA_AGGRES