On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was told long time ago that -ounion is even
> more broken than unionfs.
That's wrong. The union mount option was _never_ really
broken. I'm using it for almost as long as FreeBSD exists.
I recently not
[Note: stripped excessive Cc.]
Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, I was wondering: is unionfs related in any way with -ounion
> option of mount_*?
No. The union mount option (-o union) is completely separate
from UNIONFS, although it can be used to achieve a somewhat
similar ef
* Daichi GOTO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the commitment of
> latest unionfs improvements for 8-current, RELENG_7 and
> RELENG_6. Now you can get more stable operation using
> unionfs on latest 8/7/6.
>
> This latest improvements give finstall and FreeSBIE
Hi unionfs folks
It is my pleasure and honor to announce the commitment of
latest unionfs improvements for 8-current, RELENG_7 and
RELENG_6. Now you can get more stable operation using
unionfs on latest 8/7/6.
This latest improvements give finstall and FreeSBIE works
more well as well as other u
