tc/defaults/rc.conf.orig 2010-08-25 11:01:12.00000 +0300
> +++ /etc/defaults/rc.conf 2010-08-25 11:01:29.0 +0300
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
> #ifconfig_ed0_ipx="ipx 0x00010010" # Sample IPX address family entry.
> #ifconfig_fxp0_name="net0" # Cha
Hello ,
Refers to rc.conf(5) the alternative way for cloning interfaces is by
using create_args_ variable
In rc.conf there is a typo error in variable name
--- /etc/defaults/rc.conf.orig 2010-08-25 11:01:12.0 +0300
+++ /etc/defaults/rc.conf 2010-08-25 11:01:29.0 +0300
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:03:35AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
I finally managed to test this in RELENG_6. The system performance is
not obviously bad, but sound playback is distorted (e.g. the 'bell' in
KDE is much higher pitched than it should be, and on the console it is
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:46:46PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:03:35AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> >>>I finally managed to test this in RELENG_6. The system performance is
> >>>not obviously bad, but sound playback is distorted (e.g. the 'bell
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:03:35AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >I finally managed to test this in RELENG_6. The system performance is
> >not obviously bad, but sound playback is distorted (e.g. the 'bell' in
> >KDE is much higher pitched than it should be, and on the console it is
> >low pitched
:
njl 2006-01-29 05:51:58 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
etc/defaults rc.conf
Log:
Enable the lowest Cx state by default. This will save power and we have
had enough testing of acpi_cpu to know this is stable now.
On my desktop system (running RELENG_6 though
at 05:51:58AM +, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>njl 2006-01-29 05:51:58 UTC
> > >>>
> > >>> FreeBSD src repository
> > >>>
> > >>> Modified files:
> > >>> etc/defaults rc.conf
>
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004, Kim Culhan wrote:
> Took a look at the latest -stable rc.conf, this is a fine thing.
>
> Are there any docs with more info on this new jail setup ?
There is an example under "Jail Configuration" in /etc/default/rc.conf.
And together with a patch which we are currently furthe
Ralf-
Took a look at the latest -stable rc.conf, this is a fine thing.
Are there any docs with more info on this new jail setup ?
I've been running some 'virtual machines' for some time and
I'd like to convert to this latest method for running jails.
-kim
__
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Mike Meyer wrote:
> What's missed here is that running an old kernel and a new userland is
> more likely to screw things up.
In fact this is now broken if you try to build -current on a -stable box.
You can't run the -current userland on a -stable kernel to do an install
an
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
typed:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> > Yes, but the problem I usually have is twofold: I usually run
> > mergemaster in single-user mode,
> You don't have to do that. Nothing you install in /etc (except
> hosts.allow
On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 12:17:37AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Tue Apr 23, 2002 at 11:07:18PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > > The main issues I see about pa
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > Depends on the user. My rc.conf has perhaps 15 lines and some of those
> > are simply there because the OpenSSH and bind ports in STABLE tend to
> > lag quite a bit behind the release and the port versions are installed
> > in
ile on my gateway/mail server/file server box has
> 57 lines. My crash box has 26, about half of which are there just because
> I test /etc/rc* stuff a lot. /etc/defaults/rc.conf has 250+ variables.
OK. Thanks for the confirmation.
> > Yes; however, I'd rather do this once at ins
thing off in /etc/inetd.conf and
leave inetd_enable="NO" in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Please.
--
:{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
Speednet Communications
http://www.speednet.com.au/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
just committed a fix to -current that he plans to mfc before the
4.6-release code freeze.
> On that last item and how it relates to /etc/defaults, I agree with
> various other people that I *don't* want a 400-line rc.conf file.
Given that there are only about 250 variables in
theory of the idea of periodically 'copying' the
/etc/defaults/rc.conf to /etc and weeding through it, in practice I
really don't think this is workable. (most of us just won't do it
often enough, and this is one reason I think many of us prefer
FreeBSD's system of defau
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I really hate to see the suggestion that people copy files from
> /etc/defaults to /etc. This really breaks the paradigm of having only
> changes in defaults in /etc so that defaults can be changed with a
> normal system update.
But that was ne
not all other files
Could it be that i missed something?
BTW:
Temporarily fixed it myself by putting
[ -f /etc/rc.conf ] && . /etc/rc.conf
just after the last comment block in /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
Hope that doesn't break anything :)...
--
Ago
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
ll_ of the /etc/rc* files to the latest
versions, since many of them (including rc.firewall) use the method of
sourcing the rc.conf files that is now included in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf. If you have old rc files that depend on
/etc/defaults/rc.conf doing the recursive sourcing itself, you're out
20 matches
Mail list logo
