On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 06:16 -0700, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> Dnia 18-10-2011 o 14:12:56 Alberto Villa napisał(a):
>
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> > wrote:
> >> Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
> >> be done as a last step.
> >
> > Well,
Dnia 18-10-2011 o 14:12:56 Alberto Villa napisał(a):
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wrote:
Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
be done as a last step.
Well, few weeks prior to -RELEASE can be considered a last step. :)
If you are impacted by
Alberto Villa wrote this message on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:12 +0200:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
> > Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
> > be done as a last step.
>
> Well, few weeks prior to -RELEASE can be considered a last step.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wrote:
> Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should
> be done as a last step.
Well, few weeks prior to -RELEASE can be considered a last step. :)
> If you are impacted by sbp(4) hangs please follow this thread:
>
>
> http:/
Dnia 18-10-2011 o 01:28:36 Alberto Villa napisał(a):
Hello!
It has been reported several times that some motherboards have issues
at boot with sbp driver loaded. To hide the problem, the driver was
removed from GENERIC in 8-STABLE, but it was left in -CURRENT and it
is now going into 9-STABLE.
