On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:56 PM Mario Olofo wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> The ext4 don't have data checksum, but have metadata checksum, which would
> probably be corrupted as well, as I reinstalled my Linux over the same
> partition the FreeBSD was using, and by
> now I have a lo
orruption has occurred — they’ll just corrupt silently — so
I’m wondering how you’ve ruled that out.
Thanks,
—
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
initially seems more like potentially
DNS resolution or firewall/connectivity than something LDAP related like
failure to bind successfully…
Thanks,
-Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
her previous macOS version you were
using), and if so, were you encountering the same issue?
Thanks,
—
Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
Try this instead, should be significantly faster at just displaying
snapshots without the sizing info (if that works for your use case):
# zfs list -t snapshot -o name -s name
Thanks,
—
Matt Garber
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM mike tancsa wrote:
> We have a backup server that has a f
63170 ssh2
> Oct 18 10:35:35 ryzen-r12 sshd[63439]: debug1:
> /home/testuser1/.ssh/authorized_keys:2: matching key found: RSA
> SHA256:xx
I think it must be something that the server is trying even if the client
doesn’t actually send that type, since I also tested with OpenS
could think of, but unfortunately wasn’t able to determine which auth
type that log line corresponded to. It could also be an auth type that was
previously used, but sshd in 12.0-RELEASE re-ordered the processing sequence to
try it before public keys.
Thanks,
--
Matt Garber
___
ediate issue of getting blocked by sshguard before successfully processing
my key.)
Thanks,
--
Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
? Especially since that would hopefully allow you to continue your
other work without any additional issues or oddities to sort through in the
meantime?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
ade some significant
strides in that area, even if the overall security attitude of maintainers
has been slower to positive change than would be ideal.
—
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
’m not sure what you meant about Linux distros not categorizing fixes,
though — with some notable exceptions, most of the big ones certainly tag
security fixes separately, which is what allows `unattended-upgrades` on
Debian/Ubuntu based systems (and `yum-cron` on RHEL) to work so nicely
automatically as s
> On May 15, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>
> On 5/15/19 6:16 PM, Matt Garber wrote:
>
>> Exactly. If batching 8 (or more) individual bugs/issues together into
>> one release is really causing admin/manpower overload and angst,then
>> maybe it’s tim
ems like it would
be related to how else you’re handling the upgrade process(es), not whether the
fixes are batched or not. Whatever other negative things you can say about
them, I don’t hear enterprise admins begging that Microsoft/Oracle/whoever
would dribble out patches one at a time each
ion you have installed via
packages/ports/etc.
Thanks,
—
Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
mpiling-and-installing-modsecurity-for-open-source-nginx/>,
after taking care of the prerequisites with FreeBSD packages instead. Like I
said, you could probably relatively easily hack the nginx port to add in the
integration of ModSecurity3-nginx if you care about that more than keeping
d | grep security
ap24-mod_security-2.9.2_3 Intrusion detection and prevention engine
modsecurity3-3.0.3_1 Intrusion detection and prevention engine
Thanks,
—
Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
protocol for exactly the scenario
you’re describing; I’ve heard it’s very straightforward and powerful to use,
although haven’t had to use it on any of my HAProxy instances which are
primarily doing L7.
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/preserve-source-ip-address-despite-reverse
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Brian Neal wrote:
>
> Thanks, Matt. I did try the update procedure from the handbook and found the
> instance hanging on boot with a repeated socket error. If I have to rebuild
> from scratch, I’d prefer to find some jail/deployment-automation so
be fine. If you’re still nervous, just snapshot your
boot EBS volume first as an extra precautionary measure, and destroy it once
you verify everything post-upgrade.
--
Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/
another CC prior to upgrading to
12.0-RELEASE/STABLE, or they should wait until the Errata Notice is
hopefully released with the reverted change. Otherwise they'll encounter
the same network connection stalls and problems.
--
Thanks,
-Matt Garber
_
an Errata Notice will hopefully be published at some point
in January after the holidays.
Hope this saves some troubleshooting!
—
Thanks,
-Matt Garber
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
is offensive, then I guess there's nothing to talk about.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:09 AM blubee blubeeme wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:48 AM Matt S wrote:
>
>> It really seems like the project would benefit from having better hardware
>> stats. If you ma
It really seems like the project would benefit from having better hardware
stats. If you make it a package, people have to be educated to get it and
use it--not that it doesn't have value, it just isn't well exposed and you
will only get stats from the most clueful users.
I would suggest making an
ils.
I do this:
In /etc/fstab:
devfs /usr/local/etc/unbound/dev devfs rw 0 0
In /etc/rc.conf:
devfs_set_rulesets="/usr/local/etc/unbound/dev=devfsrules_unbound"
In /etc/devfs.rules:
[devfsrules_unbound=10]
add hide
add path random unh
On Jul 13 02:11, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
13.07.2018 1:14, Matt Smith wrote:
I run acme.sh with it configured to log to syslog. I use this syslog.conf
structure to log to a specific log file:
!-acme.sh
... other syslog.conf entries ...
!acme.sh
*.*/var/log/acme.log
!*
This has worked
g it with \ and it doesn't make any
difference.
Thanks,
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ent status, and disable it as required.
And thank you for pointing this out. I can now just wait a while to see
what comes along rather than accidentally upgrading it and killing the
already really slow performance.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@f
ilemon" to /etc/rc.conf with a kldload filemon.
Doing this makes builds take a couple of minutes on average rather than
12 hours.
pkgbase I have been monitoring the mailing list, but I haven't actually
tried it yet. The problems with /etc merging makes m
around 6 hours. Clang4 made it around 8 hours. And
now clang5 it took 12 hours!
This is on an Intel Atom D525 with amd64. And I have a few things
disabled too like lib32 and profiled libraries.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
solve it. It's not
intuitive unless you have come across this before.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
updating from stable/10?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e delete-old-libs
I do this because I don't have a keyboard or monitor on the machine
during normal use. This has *always* worked fine. However for a major
version upgrade from say 10.x to 11.x I have always done it the correct
and proper way using single use
On Aug 28 09:02, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi again! Just to let you know that it's definitely ccache at fault.
With ccache commented out of make.conf the compile runs through fine.
It took 7 hours, but at least that is better than the over 14 hours
that it was taking with WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILE
On Aug 27 12:20, Matt Smith wrote:
This was with all of those commented out options in make.conf and
src.conf from my last email uncommented once again, but with a
completely clean ccache. This time I'm trying another build but with
ccache commented out, but the three src.conf options
On Aug 27 08:56, Matt Smith wrote:
I have not been running this build within script(1) though I am afraid
so I don't have a copy of the whole build. I might stop the build and
reenable all of the options again, but this time with a completely
empty ccache.
I just tried this, and it b
On Aug 26 22:49, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/26/2016 6:38 AM, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi, I'm attempting to compile the latest stable/11 from a 12 day old
stable/10 system and I'm getting the following error. I've tried
completely deleting /usr/obj. I've tried without make -j. And I
mon/memcmplen.h:19:11:
fatal error:
'immintrin.h' file not found
# include
^
1 error generated.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
bmake[4
the missing file and the
permissions are now 600.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
f ssh as well? I use the
port and it has always annoyed me that I get constant "connection
refused" whilst I'm waiting for the server to fully boot up!
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On Aug 26 17:35, Chris H wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:38:46 +0100 Matt Smith wrote
On Aug 26 12:27, Matt Smith wrote:
>On Aug 26 13:10, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>>Hardware error or memory exhausted
>>>
>>>It does appear to be something along those lines.
On Aug 26 12:27, Matt Smith wrote:
On Aug 26 13:10, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
Hardware error or memory exhausted
It does appear to be something along those lines. It's not memory
exhaustion as it has around 2GB free at the point it fails. However I've
deleted /usr/obj and s
rts. It fails compiling
something from lib like openssl or kerberos. Doesn't buildworld build a
bootstrap version of clang and then use that version to compile the rest
of it? I might try downgrading my sources back to the version that I
last succesfully compiled just to prove it one way or the
On Aug 26 11:09, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:01:25AM +0100, Matt Smith wrote:
Trying to do a buildworld from the latest stable seems to result in a
failure within openssl. Anyone else seen this?
--- ocsp_ext.o ---
cc -O2 -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE
-I/usr/src
]: stopped in /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
/questions/2010-April/026304.html
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Jul 13 11:29, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi, I use the ports version of OpenSSL for everything and don't require
the base version. As a result I thought I would remove it by adding
WITHOUT_OPENSSL into /etc/src.conf and running make delet
s and gssapi, which is understandable as they depend on OpenSSL.
However it doesn't seem to touch any OpenSSL files at all. Is this a bug
or have I missed something?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
version from /usr/src/etc/rc.d/ntp into /usr/local/etc/rc.d. This should
be fixed. I guess this wouldn't be too difficult to do. I said six
months ago that I might look at submitting a patch to do this, maybe I
should actually do it.
--
Matt
On Apr 08 12:56, Adam McDougall wrote:
On 04/08/2015 12:48, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded my server to 10.1-STABLE r281264 and when I ran
mergemaster it told me that /etc/rc.d/ntpd was stale and would I like to
delete it. It's never done this before. I've figured out it
ion with ntpd_program and ntpd_config set. With this
latest change it means I have to have the base version installed again.
Is it possible to get the port version to have its own rc script?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On Mar 23 22:26, Matt Smith wrote:
On Mar 23 11:36, Matt Smith wrote:
On Mar 23 11:33, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
we experiencing a problem after upgrading the openssl port to openssl
1.0.2.
/usr/bin/vi started to crash after some seconds with segfault.
/rescue/vi works just fine. Deleting
On Mar 23 11:36, Matt Smith wrote:
On Mar 23 11:33, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
we experiencing a problem after upgrading the openssl port to openssl
1.0.2.
/usr/bin/vi started to crash after some seconds with segfault.
/rescue/vi works just fine. Deleting the openssl 1.0.2 package
everything
guess was probably nginx hitting it
with tons of requests. Mine is 10.1-STABLE amd64.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t links against it. Then
they will both be on 1.0.1. Could be an interesting test?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi. With the recent delays from the security incident and the three SAs out of
the way, what now are we waiting for? I think we should just get rid of the
release schedule on FreeBSD.org if we aren't even going to be close to the set
dates.
RC3 has been really stable for me, but we have a no no
On 09/13/12 18:04, Chris Nehren wrote:
> Relevant to my interests, too. I've followed the instructions on the
> wiki / in the handbook (on 9.0/9.1-PRE) and only receive error messages.
> Is DTrace supposed to be working properly on 9.x, or is it still
> experimental?
>From my experience, as long a
On 08/30/12 09:12, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Stop state indicates that the process is stopped or being stopped. The later
> is your case. The process has one thread executing exit1() kernel function,
> which terminates the process. In the course of work, the function notifies
> all other threads
Is it possible to forcibly kill process from DDB which are unkillable from
userland? My understanding is the 'kill' command is effectively the same as
the userland version, so perhaps a process could be terminated by invoking
an OOM handler or something?
I just had a VirtualBox instance crash and
On 2012-08-28 22:51, Matt Smith wrote:
On 2012-08-27 21:35, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Matt Smith wrote:
Thank you for your help anyway, and your wonkity site, which I also
once used for converting my procmail to maildrop. And thanks also to
Erich and Stefan for your help. When
Following http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland on 9.1-RC1, the example
fails to work as demonstrated:
# dtrace -s pid.d -c test
dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes
CPU IDFUNCTION:NAME
1 59284 main:entry
dtrace: pid 25479 exited with status 1
On 2012-08-27 21:35, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Matt Smith wrote:
Thank you for your help anyway, and your wonkity site, which I also
once used for converting my procmail to maildrop. And thanks also to
Erich and Stefan for your help. When I get some spare time I'll redo
spare time I'll redo the
filesystem and hope that it works.
Matt.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2012-08-27 14:56, Warren Block wrote:
Stefan called it. The newfs is done on /dev/gpt/gptroot, no problem
there. But when glabel writes to /dev/ada0p2--which is
/dev/gpt/gptroot, same thing, it overwrites the last block. And then
the filesystem is mounted with the glabel device, which is a
On 2012-08-27 11:26, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I would run plain UFS for / /var and /tmp and see what will happen
then.
I know what you will answer. But it will help to isolate the problem.
Did you mean not use the label at all? If so I just tried this. Set
/dev/ada0p2 in the fstab. No change.
On 2012-08-27 10:25, c...@milos.co.za wrote:
I'm far from anything near an expert on file systems but I'd suggest
you remove softupdates and leave journaling on.
tunefs -n disable
There's no need to have both on and although I agree that both SHOULD
work together there's no reason to have them on
On 2012-08-27 10:28, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Is there a particular reason you've decided to glabel your partitions
instead of using GPT labels? Which device did you do the newfs on,
the
GPT partition or the glabel device? My hunch is that the label
metadata sector at the end of the GPT partition
I posted on this mailing list two weeks ago and never received any
replies so I decided to raise a PR via the web form. But I think I
submitted it under the wrong category and it's marked as low priority as
well. But I think this is something that is a potential serious problem
if I end up gett
nting from the USB install stick that I used which was 9.1-BETA1, it's
only started doing this since I updated it to RELENG_9_1. I did make a
custom kernel file when I did that as well, but I don't think I've taken
anything important out
On Jun 18, 2012 9:34 PM, "Matthias Gamsjager" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Quentin Schwerkolt <
> develloper.u...@hotmail.fr> wrote:
>
> > I have had a similar problem with my HP Elitebook 8540p and I solved it
> > by moving the sata controller from ahci to ide in the bios.
> >
I've
pts ?
i.e. can you see this with "systat -vm 1" with a large number in the "intr"
field.
If yes, run "vmstat -i" to see what interrupt is being hit.
Then tell us what hardware is on that irq (from grep irq
/var/run/dmesg.boot).
Matt
__
On Apr 18, 2012 3:54 AM, "Jeremy Chadwick" wrote:
>
> (Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list)
>
> I'd like to request that folks running RELENG_8 (and RELENG_9, though I
> do not use it) please check the behaviour of their terminal after each
> of following commands are run (check
On Apr 18, 2012 2:23 AM, "Chad C" wrote:
>
> The first suggestion from a forum poster was bad memory but I swapped out
the memory and still received the panics. Also tested the memory with
memtest86+ and the bios memory test feature. Both reported no errors. I
finally was able to get it to boot
On Apr 16, 2012 5:42 AM, "Ronald Klop" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:09:34 +0200, Matt Thyer
wrote:
>
>> On Apr 15, 2012 6:27 PM, "Ronald Klop"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The problem does not occur with 9-STABLE.
>>>>
&
On Apr 15, 2012 6:27 PM, "Ronald Klop" wrote:
>
>> The problem does not occur with 9-STABLE.
>>
>> Who knows what the problem was ? USB maybe ?
>
>
> Do you still have the same hardware on the same interrupts on 9-STABLE?
> Are there changes in the use of MSI(-X)?
>
I made no hardware or BIOS chan
On Apr 7, 2012 2:38 PM, "Matt Thyer" wrote:
>
> On 7 April 2012 14:31, Matt Thyer wrote:
>> Since moving the SATA 3 disk to the onboard Intel SATA 2 controller I'm
no longer having that disk evicted from the raidz2 pool with write errors
and I thought that the high in
On 7 April 2012 14:31, Matt Thyer wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 01:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matt Thyer wrote:
>> > So it seems that both the old and new mps driver have a problem with the
>> > Western Digital WD20EARX SATA 3 drive
On 5 April 2012 01:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > So it seems that both the old and new mps driver have a problem with the
> > Western Digital WD20EARX SATA 3 drive on a SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i (SAS
> > 6G) controller (flas
On 4 April 2012 21:55, Desai, Kashyap wrote:
> Mike,
> Have your purchase LSI controller through Channel or OEM ?
> It would be a difficult for developers to help you without any support
> channel invovoled ?
> If possible can you contact LSI support channel ?
>
Kashyap,
On 25 March 2012 22:26, Matt Thyer wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if and when this driver was merged from current to
> 8-STABLE ?
>
> If I can work out what revision that occurred in I'll go back to just
> before then to confirm if the problem exists.
>
In the -CURRENT li
On Mar 31, 2012 5:02 AM, "Jim Bryant"
@ gmail.com > wrote:
>
> Matt Thyer wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Jim Bryant"
>>
@ gmail.com @
gmail.com >> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ever since I have upgraded to 9-stable, I hav
On Mar 29, 2012 5:18 AM, "Jim Bryant" wrote:
>
> Ever since I have upgraded to 9-stable, I have noticed that the manpages
seem to be munged up with displayed instead of processed ESCape codes.
I believe that this is due to the terminal type of the console changing
from "cons25" to "xterm". If yo
On 03/28/12 12:40, Fred Liu wrote:
>> Shouldn't imagine so... I'm using a set of 4x four-bay Chenbro
>> 80H10321513C0 jobbies in a 4U box for a total of 16 disks.
>>
>> My original post showed me lighting up an identification LED by poking
>> values at the backplane via the ses device, but the Arec
On 03/28/12 06:11, Fred Liu wrote:
> Does ARC-1320 card need specific backplane to work with to identify
> HDD's position?
Shouldn't imagine so... I'm using a set of 4x four-bay Chenbro
80H10321513C0 jobbies in a 4U box for a total of 16 disks.
My original post showed me lighting up an identifica
On 03/20/12 21:53, Matt Burke wrote:
> I've also tried playing around with Areca's SDK, however
> FreeBSDSCSIInterface()->init(i) causes the closed source driver to panic
> the kernel. AFAICT that class appears to be closed source too, so that's a
> dead end too.
Ju
8-STABLE.
Does anyone know if and when this driver was merged from current to
8-STABLE ?
If I can work out what revision that occurred in I'll go back to just
before then to confirm if the problem exists.
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org maili
On Mar 22, 2012 10:14 AM, "Mike Tancsa" wrote:
>
> On 3/20/2012 1:26 AM, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2011) to
> > r232477 (4th Mar 2012) and am finding that a system process called
"intr"
> > is
Under 9.0-RELEASE I'm having trouble figuring out how to light up the drive
identification/fault lights on my enclosure (SAS disks on Chenbro
80H10321513C0 backplanes attached to Areca ARC-1320 HBAs)
Building+installing the tools in /usr/share/examples/ses gives me the
following ability:
# geten
On 21 March 2012 00:03, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:10:10PM +1030, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > On 20 March 2012 22:24, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >
> > > On 20 March 2012 12:52, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > > > On 20 March 2012 21:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
&
On 20 March 2012 22:24, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 12:52, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > On 20 March 2012 21:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> On 20/03/2012 06:26, Matt Thyer wrote:
> >> > I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2
On 20 March 2012 21:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 20/03/2012 06:26, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2011) to
> > r232477 (4th Mar 2012) and am finding that a system process called "intr"
> > is now constantly
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-STABLE NAS from r225723 (22nd Sept 2011) to
r232477 (4th Mar 2012) and am finding that a system process called "intr"
is now constantly using about 60% of 1 CPU starting a short time after
reboot (possibly triggered by use of the samba server).
When this starts, systat -vm
I've found the following thread from 2009 which matches what I've just come
across while trying to install 9-RELEASE to disk on a machine with an NFS root.
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2009-07/msg00084.html
I've just worked around this by nullfs mounting the local disk'
On 8 June 2011 20:55, Matt Thyer wrote:
> On 7 June 2011 12:03, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
>>The absolute cheapest solution is to buy a Sil-3132 PCIe card
>>(providing 2 E-SATA ports), and then connect an external port
>> multiplier
>>to each port. Exter
On 7 June 2011 12:03, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>The absolute cheapest solution is to buy a Sil-3132 PCIe card
>(providing 2 E-SATA ports), and then connect an external port multiplier
>to each port. External port multiplier enclosures typically support
>5 drives each so that would g
SAS2008 performance with mps(4) driver
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-March/thread.html#61862
>
Those threads assure me that the SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i with version 9
firmware and the mps(4) driver work very well as long as I'm running FreeBSD
9-CURREN
I'm not on the -STABLE list so please reply to me.
I'm using an Intel Core i3-530 on a Gigabyte H55M-D2H motherboard with 8 x
2TB drives & 2 x 1TB drives.
The plan is to have the 1 TB drives in a zmirror and the 8 in a raidz2.
Now the Intel chipset has only 6 on board SATA II ports so ideally I'm
mException("Cannot close the session
> stream",
> errno);
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> This causes it to call abort on the the thread which then crashes the app
> with
> the above stack trace, wh
hpp:78
> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> Regards
> Steve
Steve,
Did you figure this out? We're seeing something very similar with
nginx + passenger + FreeBSD 8.0.
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
#x27;ll still have 6x the capacity of
the array it's replacing.
A simple-minded dd test gives me ~180MB/s writing a single long file, and
400-500MB/s reading.
Matt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matt Reimer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
>> > I don't know, but I plan to test that scenario in a few days.
>> >
>> > Matt
>>
>> Please share the results when you're done,
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo