On 09/27/17 at 01:35P, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> I'm trying to configure bind 9.11 as a nameserver on FreeBSD
> 11-STABLE. When the bind9 port compile it enables TCP_FASTOPEN but the
> changes haven't yet been baked into the GENERIC Kernel. I can't find a
> way to disable the use of TCP_FAST
On 03/06/17 at 08:56P, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Bez?glich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 05.03.2017 22:59 (localtime):
> > Hello,
> >
> > I can easily lock up FreeBSD stable/11 from userland. Not that I want to...
> > I'm running squid, which starts an authentication helper
> > "*negotiate
On 02/07/17 at 05:55P, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in Brendan Gregg's tutorial:
>
> http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html
>
> it says to run
>
> pmcstat ?S RESOURCE_STALLS.ANY -O out.pmcstat sleep 10
Not sure if it's the mailer or what but it should
On 12/16/16 at 11:20P, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 15.12.2016 20:51, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > On 12/15/16 at 05:23P, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Sometimes on one of my servers I got dmesg full of
> >>
> >> sonewconn: pcb
On 12/15/16 at 05:23P, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sometimes on one of my servers I got dmesg full of
>
> sonewconn: pcb 0xf80373aec000: Listen queue overflow: 49 already in
> queue awaiting acceptance (6 occurrences)
[skip]
>
> but at the time of investigation the socket is already
On 10/06/16 at 09:51P, Julien Charbon wrote:
>
> Hi Hiren,
>
> On 10/6/16 9:44 AM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > On 10/06/16 at 09:28P, Julien Charbon wrote:
> >> On 9/28/16 1:59 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:06:47PM +0200,
On 10/06/16 at 09:28P, Julien Charbon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 9/28/16 1:59 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:06:47PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
> >>
> >> I am still trying to reproduce your issue, without success so far.
>
> Thanks for Slawa effort and multiple deb
On 09/16/16 at 02:46P, hiren panchasara wrote:
> On 09/16/16 at 11:30P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:11:55PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > As I suspected, this looks like a hang trying to lock V_tcbinfo.
> > &g
On 09/16/16 at 11:30P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:11:55PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> >
> > As I suspected, this looks like a hang trying to lock V_tcbinfo.
> >
> > I'm ccing Julien here who worked on WLOCK -> RLOCK tra
+ jch@
On 09/16/16 at 10:03P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:30:53AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> > On 09/16/16 at 09:18P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:06:33PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > >
>
ote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
> > > > > > Under
On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> > >
> &
On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
> > > Under high network load and may b
On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>
> > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
> > > Under high network load and may b
On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
> Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to
> unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI
> emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this ex
On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
> >
> > They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
> > swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I wouldn't worry
> > about it, the only thing I can think of is to
On 01/15/16 at 02:48P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> 02:14:20.410159 IP 127.0.0.1.5423 > 127.0.0.1.80: Flags [S], seq 818919263,
> win 65535, options [mss 16344,nop,wscale 9,sackOK,TS val 749536482 ecr 0],
> length 0
> 02:14:20.410173 IP 127.0.0.1.80 > 127.0.0.1.5423: Flags [S.], seq 644693209,
>
+ net@
On 12/03/15 at 06:24P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> After upgrading STABLE to r291456 I am see bunch of sockets in
> TIME_WAIT state. In normal situation I am expect about 30k-50k such
> sockets. Now I am see all of net.inet.tcp.maxtcptw (440k currently).
> Setting net.inet.tcp.msl to low val
On 08/20/15 at 12:57P, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I got silent data corruption when transferring data via em(4) interface on
> 10.2-STABLE r286912.
> 1. I got broken large file transferred via ftp (MD5 checksum mismatched);
> 2. I got disconnects when transferring large data via ssh with me
19 matches
Mail list logo
