Re: ZFS ghost files on 11.3-STABLE

2019-11-25 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2019-11-25 (18:35), Miroslav Lachman wrote: > It is possible you have some non printable (invisible) character in the > filename. It can be trailing space, newline or something else so in fact Wow I'm an idiot, thought I'd spotted a bug, yes there was a trailing space, many thanks. ___

ZFS ghost files on 11.3-STABLE

2019-11-25 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I deleted a file (rm filter) by mistake instead of its backup 'filter~', however it seems a remnant of a much older version of the file (given by its date and content) is half hanging around? $ ls -l filter ls: filter: No such file or directory $ ls -l filter* -rw-r--r-- 1 lordcow lord

Re: screen crashes on 11.3-STABLE

2019-10-28 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2019-10-28 (14:24), Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > My analysis: screen dumps core on terminals with TERM=xterm* or > TERM=rxvt* if they don't advertise Km ("key_mouse") capability Ah great, many thanks and for the commit, and yes I had my TERM set differently on the host. ___

screen crashes on 11.3-STABLE

2019-10-28 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I upgraded from 11-STABLE r344000 to r353939 and now screen (sysutils/screen) crashes inside both my jails: $ screen [screen caught signal 11. (core dumped)] (there's no core dump). kernel log: pid 56569 (screen), jid 2, uid 1001: exited on signal 6 This happens as a user or root,

Re: 10.1-STABLE bce: Watchdog timeout occurred

2015-04-21 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
7;s a long shot, but you could try increasing BCE_DMA_ALIGN and/or BCE_RX_BUF_ALIGN in the include file if_bcereg.h, say up to 4096, to see whether it makes any difference. - Gareth. On 21/04/2015 10:52, Alnis Morics wrote: On 04/21/2015 06:17 AM, Chris Ross wrote: I got a new [to me] s

RE: msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem

2015-04-15 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
=0 mskc0: msk_handle_events: Break #1 cons=512 csrread=519 mskc0: msk_handle_events: sd=0xfe011e23c000 sd->msk_control=0 control=0 ...etc From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] on behalf of Yonghyeon PYUN [pyu...@gmail.com] Sent: 13

msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem

2015-04-12 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
developers would consider committing these as it may be useful for future debugging. Gareth. --- if_mskreg.h-orig 2014-11-11 20:02:58.0 + +++ if_mskreg.h 2015-04-12 18:47:20.0 +0100 @@ -2179,9 +2179,11 @@ * At first I guessed 8 bytes, the size of a single descriptor, would

Re: schg flags from installworld

2012-09-19 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2012-09-18 (23:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > Looking at /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk and /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk - > bins and libs get installed with schg if PRECIOUSPROG and PRECIOUSLIB are > set respectively in their makefiles, both of which can be overridden by > sett

Re: unrecognised external drive

2012-08-16 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Wed 2012-08-15 (08:58), Erich Dollansky wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:34:37 +0200 > > idVendor 0x1058 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. > > idProduct 0x1042 > > could it be that the kernel does not know this product? > > You can check the sources (usbdevs should be t

unrecognised external drive

2012-08-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I bought a Western Digital external drive a few months ago but it gets kicked out 20 seconds after I plug it in. I've updated to the latest 8.3-STABLE: $ uname -a FreeBSD file 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 12 12:45:04 SAST 2012 root@file:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COWNEL amd64

Re: gmirror not synced

2012-01-07 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2012-01-05 (09:56), Matthew Seaman wrote: > drive is actually generating errors.) Also try a few passes of > memtest86 to try and spot problems with RAM. Yes that was the problem, have gotten rid of a faulty DIMM and everything is looking a lot saner, thanx :> _

gmirror not synced

2012-01-04 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually cycles between 2 hashes per file. I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file randomly from 1 of 2 component drives, and the files in question had a

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-12-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2010-12-06 (13:07), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > 'zpool replace' also only works if you physically swap out a disk > at the same port, or replace disk1 with disk2 online. 'zpool remove' > and 'zpool detach' don't remove devices from a raidz. > >

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-12-06 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Sat 2010-11-27 (15:22), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in > a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's Ok I did some science, it looks like the array doesn't like me throwing zeros at the disk

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:10.openssl

2010-12-02 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-12-02 (00:05), jhell wrote: > Try that with a ( make includes ) in that same directory and if it works > then the advisory will have to be revised. Ah awesome, that works thanx. (I don't see why though, since it was only half complaining about a missing definition, even when I manuall

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:10.openssl

2010-12-01 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2010-11-29 (21:19), FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch > # cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl > # make obj && make depend && make && make install Hi all, I'm following the instructions with: # cvsup /etc/cvsup-src.conf # rm -rf /usr/obj # cd /usr/sr

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-11-27 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Sat 2010-11-27 (07:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > uname -a please -- it matters greatly. $ uname -a FreeBSD file 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 24 07:56:04 SAST 2010 r...@file:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COWNEL amd64 ___ freebsd-stabl

ZFS raidz recovery

2010-11-27 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's a transcript with interspersed commentary: r...@file:~# zpool status pool: raid state: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat Nov 27 13:20:06 2010

Re: source tree out of sync

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-21 (11:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > I assume I can't do this safely if my /usr/src tree has been updated > since my last make world? Well, doesn't look like it's an issue for me in this instance. ___ freebsd-stabl

source tree out of sync

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, in for example http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc : # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/lib/libbz2 # make obj && make depend && make && make install I assume I can't do this safely if my /usr/src tree has been updated since my last make worl

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-15 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (13:54), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > Regarding net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout=15000 -- you don't see any > > improvement at all? That's a bit strange. There's probably something > > If there

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Regarding net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout=15000 -- you don't see any > improvement at all? That's a bit strange. There's probably something If there was an improvement it was subtle (I was doing sporadic measurements), just that in the end my fir

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:03), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > You're absolutely certain these are all in FIN_WAIT_2 state and not > TIME_WAIT? Yup, $ netstat -an | grep FIN_WAIT_1 | wc -l 57 $ netstat -an | grep FIN_WAIT_2 | wc -l 431 $ netstat -an | grep TIME_WAIT | wc -l 17 _

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (13:49), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > > Thirdly, if you feel FIN_WAIT2 is the cause of your problem, then you > > should consider adjusting the following sysctl: > > > > net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout > > > > Try something like 15000 (15 se

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-13 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:43), Jack Vogel wrote: > No, not the add-on adapter, i have no trouble finding those, what I want to > know about is the details about the system that has em0 LOM, only > way to check on that is to have the whole enchilada :) Ah right. These are snippets from dmidecode, is t

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-12 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (17:00), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > On Thu 2010-09-09 (16:54), Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > -c asks for pci device capabilities, which are read in > > > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c:177 with O_RDWR > > Ah. I'll have to schedule a reboot the

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-12 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:41), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > > Gareth, set hw.pci.honor_msi_blacklist=0, you'll have to do that at boot > > btw. > > Ok, I'll have to get back to you in a day or 2 when I reboot. Done: $ sysctl -a | grep msi hw.bce.msi_enable: 1 h

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (03:18), Ian Smith wrote: > Try using 'limit' rather than the unlimited 'keep-state' for inbound > dynamic connections to your server/s. eg, derived from ipfw(8): These are mostly legitimate connections though, they just aren't being closed properly. So if limit were to have an

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (09:20), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Secondly, I'm fairly certain HTTP KeepAlive (re: KeepAliveTimeout) are > unrelated to TCP keepalives[1]. I mention this because you're focusing > on netstat, which will give you indication of TCP session state, not > HTTP protocol statefulness.

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:41), Gareth de Vaux wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/058748.html Just to reiterate - those are the specs of the PCI card that doesn't work. The PCI card doesn't come up with MSIX failures. The onboard has the MSIX

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (13:48), Jack Vogel wrote: > Gareth's email bouncing for anybody else or is it just me? Yes sorry I disabled this alias after picking up years of spam on the mailman archives. I assumed people would primarily reply to the list. I've re-enabled it for now. &

ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi again, I use some keep-state rules in ipfw, but get the following kernel message: kernel: ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules when presumably my state table reaches its limit (and I effectively get DoS'd). netstat shows tons of connections in FIN_WAIT_2 state, mostly to my webserver.

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (16:54), Kurt Jaeger wrote: > -c asks for pci device capabilities, which are read in > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c:177 with O_RDWR Ah. I'll have to schedule a reboot then .. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (07:24), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't > reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list > might have ideas as to what could cause this. Nope, this's a normal host. I've got securelevel on 1,

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (07:02), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > You need to be root to use the -c flag. Despite your prompt, I don't > think you're root. Reproduction: That was as root, # id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),5(operator) # pciconf -lc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted __

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (06:13), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Can you add the "-c" flag to your pciconf command? Thanks. Forbidden? # pciconf -lvc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted # pciconf -lc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted # ls -l /dev/pci crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel0, 9 Sep

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Wed 2010-09-08 (09:41), Jack Vogel wrote: > This is what'd I'd expect, the onboard is PCH chipset, support was not in > 8.0, but as I said, in 8.1 (and hence stable/8) it is supported, and it should > work. I've just paid the machine a visit and yes, MSIX fails on the onboard but the device sti

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-08 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-07 (13:25), Jack Vogel wrote: > I've looked at the code, this message was misleading, what really happens > is that the driver fails to be able to setup either MSIX OR MSI, when this > happens it will fall back and use a Legacy interrupt, so its non-fatal and > the device should work

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-08 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-07 (10:00), Jack Vogel wrote: > First off, this device was not supported in 8.0 REL, what were you running > that last worked? Hey, I was running 8.0 REL and it worked. I installed the system from the 8.0 .iso, but the onboard card didn't work. I added the PCI card and it worked. >

MSIX failure

2010-09-06 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 r...@x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe320-0xe321,0xe322-0xe3

Re: portaudit

2007-08-28 Thread gareth
On Mon 2007-08-27 (17:09), Chuck Swiger wrote: > This might imply that your system clock on that machine is wrong...? > Double-check what it thinks is the date. date and time is synced. > Also, make sure you don't have some old version stuck in an intervening > proxy, if such is being used. i

portaudit

2007-08-27 Thread gareth
hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem. this's what happens: # portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045 kBps portaudit: Database too old. Old database restored. portaudit:

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (10:16), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Apparently pkg_fetch will use either $PKG_TMPDIR or $TMPDIR as a > temporary storage location for where things are stored. Taken from > the manpage in pkgtools-2.2.2/man/pkg_fetch.1: > > PKG_TMPDIR > TMPDIR (In that order) Temporary

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (19:48), Thomas Nystr?m wrote: > It looks like this: > > ture(root)# dir > total 50 > drwxrwxr-x 5 root wheel512 29 Aug 16:29 ./ > drwxrwxrwt 11 root wheel 3072 29 Dec 19:35 ../ > drwxrwxr-x 4 root wheel512 29 Aug 16:29 Archive_Tar-1.3.1/ > drwxrwxr-x 3 root

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (17:25), Thomas Nystr?m wrote: > I just checked one of my servers and also found a /tmp/download > directory with the same files that you had. > > I then compared the timestamp of /tmp/download with the timestamp > of the directories in /var/db/pkg: Same. > > My conclusion is th

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (11:07), Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Oct 23 00:31:42 lordcow kernel: pid 48464 (conftest), uid 0: exited on > > signal 12 (core dumped) > > Oct 23 01:19:26 lordcow kernel: pid 17512 (conftest), uid 0: exited on > > signal 12 (core dumped) > > These are from autoconf testing vario

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-12-28 (22:10), David Todd wrote: > something's up, nothing in ports will write to a /tmp/download > directory, so either you or someone with root access did it. thought as much :/ > I suggest: > checking /var/log/auth.log for attempted breachings i had a rough skim and nothing suspic

system breach

2006-12-28 Thread gareth
hey guys, my server rebooted a few days ago, and while i was looking around for possible reasons (none came up, which's disconcerting in itself) i found this suspicious directory: $ ls -l /tmp/download total 44 drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel512 Oct 23 16:28 Archive_Tar-1.3.1 drwxr-xr-x 3 root whe

Re: portupgrade

2006-12-03 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-12-03 (21:30), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Update your ports tree? The index is probably newer than the actual > ports. sorry i should've mentioned that, i always run this beforehand: cvsup -L 2 /etc/cvsup.conf portsdb -Fu ___ freebsd-stable@fre

portupgrade

2006-12-03 Thread gareth
hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: # portversion -l "<" gnupg < p5-Compress-Zlib< p5-IO-Socket-SSL< p5-PathTools< portupgrade < rsync < spamass-milter

Re: cpu usage

2006-10-24 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-10-23 (21:15), Tore Lund wrote: > I have an XP 2200 in a normal ATX box with no extra fans. I have to > change thermal paste about once a year. Even so, I monitor the > temperature closely in the summertime and increase fan speed whenever > necessary. So there is a chance that your c

Re: cpu usage

2006-10-23 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-10-23 (18:56), Oliver Fromme wrote: > It shouldn't change anything. The nice level will not > reduce the amount of work that your CPU is doing, it might > only shift that amount between processes. ah ok. > Depending on the type of your CPU (which you didn't tell > us), it might be po

cpu usage

2006-10-23 Thread gareth
hi, i'm on FreeBSD 6.1, with a problematic cpu - it seems to be overheating and shutting the system down when running intensive jobs, at the moment i can't even finish compiling the mysql-server in ports. i've tried running the make with an increased nice level, but that doesn't seem to change much

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (19:33), Ronald Klop wrote: > You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment. > In bash it is: > export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true thanx ;) > But know what you are doing. I do not recommend you to install vulnerable > ports. yes i don't feel to easy about it, m

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (20:03), Miroslav Lachman wrote: > There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough. thanx, that did the trick. > Permissions denied may be caused by your file system mount options - if > you have /var (/var/db/pkg)

portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it "has known vulnerabilities". trying to tell it it's ok with 'portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf doesn't work, and trying to deinstall portaudit: /usr/ports/security/portaudit# make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for s

Re: kernel compilation error

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (14:39), Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 22.10.2006 um 12:07 schrieb gareth: > > >now i added "CFLAGS=-O -pipe", and "NO_PROFILE=true" to /etc/ > >make.conf and tried to recompile the kernel: > > > >make buildkernel KERNCONF=K

kernel compilation error

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
hey guys, i have a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.1 and have only done a cvsup (with a 'ports-all' in my cvsup.conf file, that doesn't affect the kernel source does it?). now i added "CFLAGS=-O -pipe", and "NO_PROFILE=true" to /etc/make.conf and tried to recompile the kernel: make buildkernel KERNCONF

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-21 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so >

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-17 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so > i

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-14 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote, inter alia, > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues

"swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-13 Thread Gareth McCaughan
ying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a -- dmesg output ends -- I would be grateful for any insight into what's going wrong and how (if at all) it can be fixed or worked around. I'm not subscribed to -questions or to -stable, so would prefer to be cc'ed, but I'll

Re: fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-05-15 (15:46), Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > OK, I was not clear enough: During normal operations what's on the disk > and the view of the system to the filesystem are not necessarily the > same - this is especially true for open files. No matter how long it > takes for fsck to run, a

Re: fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-05-15 (14:54), Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > Errm, You run fsck onto a r/w mounted partition on multiuser mode? If yep > this understanding of what your saying here is correct, then this is the > problem: a r/w mounted fs is a) never "clean" (in terms of a fsck that > takes some time t

fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
hi, this box has had far too many hard reboots, but can anyone shed some light on whether this's inconsistent? i boot into single user mode, run fsck and fix all the partitions. rerunning fsck shows no more problems. mounting the filesystems and running fsck shows no problems. but when i reboot int

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: > Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with > INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... > > "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major > release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this ca

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: > You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll > be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO > intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchindex" is > provided as a replacement fo

Re: portsdb

2006-05-10 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (09:31), gareth wrote: > hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for > quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' > (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the > power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. ok, i did: cd /usr

portsdb

2006-05-10 Thread gareth
hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-31 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (13:22), jdow wrote: > If you have ntpd running, which is the right way to do it anyway, then > ntpdate cannot run unless you tell it to use a different port than the > ntp port because it's already in use. "ntpdate -q -u pool.ntp.org" should > work for you. nope i don't have ntp

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-31 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (09:47), Kevin Oberman wrote: > You can fix this by specifying the IPv4 address (137.158.128.11) in > ntp.conf. I have been told that queries may be limited to IPv4 in > ntp.conf, but the man page does not indicate this and I have not had > time to dig into the sources. hah, that

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (18:24), gareth wrote: > > Perhaps someone with a better knowledge of the resovler can answer to > > why no ipv4 address is returned. > > yea. i get the ipv4 addy back from my linux machines. sorry that wasn't clear - when i run 'ntpdate nom.uct.ac

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (11:18), Michael Proto wrote: > Just curious, do you have ipv6 enabled in your kernel and working on > your Ethernet interface? It looks like you're only getting an ipv6 > address returned by the resolver for nom.uct.ac.za. I did a lookup > myself and I got both an ipv4 and ipv6 a

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (10:35), Michael Proto wrote: > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp > make depend > make > make install yay, ok that works ta (going into /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp as opposed to /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpdate) and the binary gets rebuilt. but, same problem :/ # ntpdate nom.uct.ac.za Looking for

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (08:54), Scot Hetzel wrote: > 2. change to sub directory where FreeBSD builds ntpdate: > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpdate > make clean > make > make install > make clean cool, thanx, i found that earlier with a 'locate ntpdate | grep Makefile' and tried to run

ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
ecompile, since there's only a Makefile.am & Makefile.in in /usr/src/contrib/ntp/ntpdate/ ? do i need to go into /usr/src and type 'make'? thanx gareth ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs

MIT Kerberos and OpenSSH

2005-01-11 Thread Gareth Hopkins
libwrap.so.3 (0x280e3000) libpam.so.2 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.2 (0x280eb000) libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x280f2000) libcrypt.so.2 => /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x281e7000) libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x281ff000) Thanks --- Gareth Hopkins Server Opera

Future support for PERC 4e/XX cards

2004-10-26 Thread Gareth Hopkins
Howdie, Was wondering if the following cards would be supported in the near future by BSD 4.10. PERC 4e/Si and PERC 4e/Di. These are from the new Dell poweredge 1850 and 2850 servers. --- Gareth Hopkins System Operations UUNET ZA ___ [EMAIL

DVD writer support in -STABLE?

2002-09-13 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I'm thinking about getting a DVD writer as a backup device for use with my -STABLE system. It's not clear to me what level of support there is for this in -STABLE. 1. If I just want to treat a DVD as an unusually large CD, will that "just work"? I mean, can I build a 4GB ISO9660 filesystem

Problem with make buildworld on a 3.3RC box

2001-02-08 Thread Gareth Hopkins
. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Is there a specific release I should be supping to? --- Gareth Hopkins To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message