On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:57:31PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 05.04.2021 17:44, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> > - remove ftp:// and http:// from libfetch. This is 2021 and we should all
> > use https://.
> Please, explain how to setup simple sever which allows upload and on-server
> file manag
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:20:44AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
| On 01.04.2021 2:39, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
|
| > | > I can only state that I use it only occasionally, and that when I do. I
| > | > have had no problems with it. I'm glad that it's there when I need it.
| &g
AID5 full support and try to avoid writes
if members didn't change. This limits our VROC support.
Thanks,
Doug A.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, se
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:54:03PM +0100, tech-lists wrote:
> it just threw me that the thing-that-was-updated didn't update its
> version information when queried. Absent sources, how can I tell it
> was updated (apart from freebsd-version -u) ?
Comparing what the SA patch says it is doing at
ht
Like the patch referenced in the SA.
https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch
Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and
CURRENT..
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.
20191104 and the latest update is dated 20190914. That is
almost a 2 month gap. Seems a bit unusual.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
> On 26 July 2020, at 13:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:11:33PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a production system (12.1-RELEASE-p6) that is showing around 1 GB of
>> Laundry pages. There are over 6 Gb Inact and 1 Gb free. I can u
about 1 GB of
updated files that have not been written back to disk? If so, then there is a
significant issue with power failures and loss of data.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 12:10:08PM -0700, Don Wilde wrote:
> It works as an available shell in 'adduser', but when I tried to use it as a
> recovery shell (see attached .odt), I ran into a problem. My fist pass was
> to add /bin/stbash to the end of the toor line in master.passwd, but that
> didn't
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:31:29AM +0200, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> subject says it all, basically.
>
> The system becomes totally unresponsive and has to be power-cycled.
Not just you.
Specificly, the behavior I see comes about only when Snapshot with a
copy of the virtual machine's memo
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 05:44:27PM -0800, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> I used freebsd-update to upgrade several 11.3-p5 systems to 12.1-p1.
> The etc update process added the ntpd/ntpd user/group. It showed the
> line changes in the plaintext passwd/group files, but the process
> appears to omit the pw
t?
|
| mpr_load="YES" goes to /etc/loader.conf
|
| If you need to load mpr manually in boot prompt I am not sure if it
| should be:
| load mpr
| or
| load mpr.ko
| of full path
| load /boot/kernel/mpr.ko
This should be a mrsas card and not an HBA! mrsas supports all current
UCS RAID c
No. Your CWD can't be copied to a PATH variable.
For cronjobs, assume nothing. Hard code all path names. Assume the
only things in the PATH are /bin:/usr/bin, otherwise give full path
names to the programs you want to run. Assume no environmental variables
are set, assume you are on the most basic
on
those machines. I don't see ue listed in either category.
-- Doug
> On 3 October 2018, at 14:05, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
>>>> Please direct replies to freebsd-arch <<<
>
> FCP-01010 (https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-0101.md)
> outlines
> On 20 June 2017, at 10:31, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Zoran Kolic wrote on 2017/06/20 17:12:
>>> Generally (and previously) the advice is to go via the next major version so
>>> you should go:
>>>
>>> 9.3 -> 10.x -> 11.x not 9.3 -> 11.x
>>
>> Exactelly what I want to avoid
> On 16 October 2016, at 08:24, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>> I would like to know what experience and tips people on this list have
>> regarding this update. Doug Hardie made it successfully. To my eyes,
>> i
> On 9 August 2016, at 04:40, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> I upgraded my local machine to the above revision a few days ago. Since then
>> I have seen the local em0 card locking up and getting he following
>> messages in dmesg
>>
>> em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
>> em0: link state cha
> On 7 August 2016, at 23:05, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>
>> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and
>> the server is running 11.0-BETA4.
>
> I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch.
> Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < some
> On 7 August 2016, at 21:27, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>
>> However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4.
>
> Would you continue informing us with the end result of your procedure.
> Personally, I will go the same way on my home nodes. I'm sure latter
> RCs would be more frien
> On 7 August 2016, at 13:59, Florian Ermisch
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 7. August 2016 08:37:45 MESZ, schrieb Kurt Jaeger :
>> […]
>>> I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
>>> upgraded. I can't go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware.
>>> However, 11.0 does boot. I ca
> On 6 August 2016, at 23:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might
>> be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0?
>
> Does
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211354
>
> help ?
>
>> I have a number of producti
to be upgraded. I can't
go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware. However, 11.0 does boot. I
can't afford the downtime to completely rebuild them.
— Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
to be upgraded. I can't
go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware. However, 11.0 does boot. I
can't afford the downtime to completely rebuild them.
— Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
f the firmware
will give me a clue. With the cards that we are currently using
the RAID cache is an option. So they only thing I'm changing is
the HW and not the firmware. However, the firmware seems to flip
itself into different device when I add or remove cache.
Thanks,
Doug A.
__
> On 17 February 2016, at 17:45, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie writes:
>
>>> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you measured that paging (not swapping; that's a more extreme
>>&g
> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> hiren panchasara writes:
>
>> On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
>>> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
swapped, which woul
command on 9.3. Eventually it returns a no
response from the server. However, ntpq works just fine and nagios is able to
get the status without problems. Both of those did not work properly before.
— Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
> On 23 September 2015, at 03:44, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons,
>>> out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service
>>> to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to
>>> a
> On 23 September 2015, at 01:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons,
> out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service
> to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to
> as
Some more testing indicates that the problem is most likely in close, not mmap.
I modified the program to the following:
zool# more test.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
int rc, pid, fd;
char *cp;
char cmd[10
> On 30 July 2015, at 01:39, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 July 2015, at 23:44, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> [reformatted]
>>
>> On 2015-Jul-29 17:41:33 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I
> On 29 July 2015, at 23:44, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> [reformatted]
>
> On 2015-Jul-29 17:41:33 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t
>> figure out what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and
>>
> On 29 July 2015, at 17:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure out
> what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over 2GB
> in use. ps shows only a kernel module [intr] with a W status. Ob
> On 29 July 2015, at 18:57, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:41:33 -0700 Doug Hardie wrote
>
>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure
>> out what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over
>>
I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure out
what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over 2GB in
use. ps shows only a kernel module [intr] with a W status. Obviously that
isn’t using the space. No other process shows a W in its stat
> On 26 March 2015, at 18:02, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:28:15 -0400 J David wrote
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>> As Kevin already noted; stopping firefox, and starting it again,
>>> seems the only solution.
>>
>> The machines in questions are servers
On 6 August 2013, at 09:18, Ted Hatfield wrote:
> I too have been updating my systems by updating and building from source. To
> recompile and install sendmail from the /usr/src tree you can run these
> commands.
>
> cd /usr/src/lib/libsm; make clean; make obj; make depend; make
> cd /usr/src
is come back. I'm not sure if Robert's
official changes did that. It's fairly easy to check what the console
device is and then do the right thing.
Thanks,
Doug A.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
As I previously indicated, I have tested a couple more Minis and updated the
instructions with what I learned. Here is the revised version:
2.12Installing FreeBSD on an Apple Mac Mini
The Mac Mini is an attractive server platform. Its small, runs cool, low
powered, and reasonably cheap.
I have documented what I have completed and what remains to be done for the
install of 9.1 on a Mini. I wrote this as a section of the Handbook, although
its not in the right format as I don't know what that format is. I believe
this needs to be retained in the documentation somewhere easily f
On 7 March 2013, at 17:00, John Mehr wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:18:23 -0800
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Ric
On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns wrote:
>
> > On 03/07/13 01:59, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> I have a new Mac Mini and have encountered the same problem
On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns wrote:
> On 03/07/13 01:59, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a new Mac Mini and have encountered the same problem reported last
>> year by Richard Kuhns. YongHyeon PYUN provided some patches to the kernel
>> that resolved the problem.
the kernel and install it.
Thanks,
-- Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
b 13, 2013 at 05:29:53PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>>> 13.02.2013 17:25, Doug Hardie ??:
>>>>>> Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
>>>>>> following interface:
>>>>>>
>>>
On 13 February 2013, at 02:29, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 13.02.2013 17:25, Doug Hardie пишет:
>> Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
>> following interface:
>>
>> msk0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>>
>> option
Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
following interface:
msk0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=c011b
ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03
inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixl
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
>> On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
>
> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
> decide to
On 29 November 2012, at 13:44, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:33 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 29 November 2012, at 06:01, Gary Palmer wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On 29 November 2012, at 06:01, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 28 November 2012, at 20:01, Devin Teske wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>
>>&
On 28 November 2012, at 20:01, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have installed 4 systems from the same FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 disk. Three of
>> them worked just fine. The last one is causing a problem. It will not look
>> in
I have installed 4 systems from the same FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 disk. Three of them
worked just fine. The last one is causing a problem. It will not look in
/usr/local/lib/ for shared libraries. I did the standard install, moved in
some source, compiled it and tried to run it. The library is there
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
>> On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
>>> "Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
>>> when SU+
|
| The machine has now been collected for repair by the supplier but I'm going
| to try and get them to put it online for more testing over the weekend.
|
| Given the failure rate so far if I can do another 4 runs with no panics I'd
| be happy that the majority of error conditions ar
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:09:42AM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
| Thanks Doug, actually just finished another test run with some more
| debugging in and I believe I've found the reason for the non-recusive
| lock and at least some of the queuing issues.
|
| The non-recursive lock is due t
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not reading CDs and rebooting
w
7;s nice when the kernel core hasn't
worked on a remote machine but we see the back trace in SEL.
| This problem need further investigation.
It might be good to instrument the code in ipmi.c in which it
sending a command and then getting status. If that is actually
looking okay then may
With FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 you can assign the same link local address manually to two
different hosts on the same network. The Neighbor Solicitations are not
responded to and you end up with non-working addresses. The simple way to
reproduce this is to boot two systems on the same network and get th
On 8/27/2012 12:27 PM, Christian Laursen wrote:
> On 08/27/12 21:03, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
>> On 27/08/2012 19:06, Christian Laursen wrote:
>>> On 08/27/12 18:49, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
rc.conf:
(I'm not convinced that obfuscating the addresses is worth the
confusion)
>>
with the case if there
was already a transaction in progress. SMIC could be done like KCS.
SSIF could be harder since it uses the i2c interface to talk to the
HW which is more complicated.
Thanks,
Doug A.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:41:58PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
For both firefox and thunderbird I'm getting this:
firefox
Fatal error 'locklevel <= 0' at line 98 in file
/frontier/svn/stable/8/lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c (errn
On 7/24/2012 2:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Doug;
>
> Perhaps you are using -O2 in you CFLAGS?
I use the standard CFLAGS, so I'm assuming the answer is yes. :)
And in case my previous message wasn't clear, this worked fine until
just today. Also, I forgot to add that
, previous working version was r238655
thr_kern.c hasn't been updated since the last 8-release, so it would
seem to be something else.
Insights welcome,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowle
On 07/20/2012 15:55, James Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> You probably know this already, but just in case ... Software memory
>> tests cannot tell you conclusively that memory is good, only that it's
>> bad.
>
On 07/21/2012 17:21, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> [ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
>>
>> On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm in the process of testing
[ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm in the process of testing 9.1 on the laptop where I use grub2
> because I had to put bsd in an `extended' slice, and I found out
> grub2 won't boot the 9.1 kernel.
Nothing will boot FreeBSD on an e
, only that it's
bad. To make sure it's good you need a hardware tester.
hth,
Doug
--
Change is hard.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Have you tried switching your scheduler to 4BSD?
--
Change is hard.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
i/o during load.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ranches for now, soon to be in 9.1-RELEASE).
Enjoy,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
Please don't try to start a new thread by replying to a message and
changing the subject line. Those of us who use threaded mail readers see
the new message under the old thread, which can cause the new message to
be missed.
It's better to start a whole new message.
hth,
Doug
--
On 06/06/2012 18:16, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 18:01, Момчил Иванов wrote:
>> Is there some remedy?
>
> Try the 4BSD scheduler.
Did you ever try this? Did it help?
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
On 06/06/2012 18:01, Момчил Иванов wrote:
> Is there some remedy?
Try the 4BSD scheduler.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsu
On 06/06/2012 11:59, Dave Hayes wrote:
> I'm describing more of a use case here, not attempting to specify an
> implementation. If a user invokes 'make', a window is presented to them
> with various options. It's probably very common that this is met with an
> initial reaction of "what the hell do
On 06/04/2012 00:10, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Why are /usr/include files installed with "install -C" during "make
>> installworld" when almost everything else is installed without the -C
>> flag? This makes it harder to
ersion altogether when installing the latest and
greatest Windows applications.
As with all things computery, your mileage may vary.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On 5/31/2012 12:21 PM, Alexander Pronin wrote:
> But, is it suitable to write sh script for 9.0, that does not work in 8.3?
No. Our tools need to work in all supported versions of FreeBSD, which
at this time includes 7 as well.
hope this helps,
Doug
PS, please don't cross-post to
On 5/29/2012 12:26 PM, Kees Jan Koster wrote:
> I seem to have a problem where really heavy disk I/O is drowning my machine.
Assuming you're using the default scheduler (SCHED_ULE), try switching
to the 4BSD scheduler in your kernel config file and see if that helps.
Doug
--
On 5/29/2012 12:37 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Doug Barton writes:
>> This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing. By humans,
>> and an -exp run. Since miwi is on the cc list, perhaps he can arrange
>> it?
>
> No -exp run required. This code is a
This needs more than diff-posting, it needs actual testing. By humans,
and an -exp run. Since miwi is on the cc list, perhaps he can arrange it?
Doug
On 5/28/2012 10:59 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> Here is the unzip diff from stable/8 -> head
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 0
sufficient. The -F option is useful on a new install when the db for -U
is not present.
> reboot
>
> as if life was normal?
Normal'ish. Personally, unless you have a specific reason to have a
clang-built world, I would avoid the hassle. (Not to mention all the
extra time tha
with your PATH in that shell.
>>
>> Try doing 'service named restart' instead.
>>
>> Doug
>
> Dear D. Barton,
>
> thanks for your response, i forgot to tell that the error i reported above
> is generated when named is restarted using bash script th
On 05/28/2012 01:28, Shiv. NK wrote:
> eval: mtree: not found
> eval: mount: not found
I assume you're typing '/etc/rc.d/named restart'. If so, there appears
to be something wrong with your PATH in that shell.
Try doing 'service named restart' instead.
Doug
--
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Freddie Cash wrote:
daily_status_security_neggrpperm_fs_ignore=""
Please don't add new examples of variables that are empty by default.
It's ok to include that line in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, just put a
comment before it.
Doug
--
It
Jan Mikkelsen writes:
| On 31/03/2012, at 1:14 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > John Baldwin writes:
| > | On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
| > | > Hi,
| > | >
| ...
| >
| > | > I have a loan LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-4i controller for testing.
| >
Alexander Motin writes:
| On 04/06/12 20:12, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > Alexander Motin writes:
| > | On 04/04/12 21:47, John Baldwin wrote:
| > |> On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:24:33 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > |>> John Baldwin writes:
| > |>> | On Tuesday, A
Alexander Motin writes:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
| On 04/04/12 21:47, John Baldwin wrote:
| > On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:24:33 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| >> John Baldwin writes:
| >> | On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:37:50 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| >
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:37:50 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > John Baldwin writes:
| > | On Monday, April 02, 2012 7:27:13 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > | > Doug Ambrisko writes:
| > | > | John Baldwin writes:
| > | > | | On Saturday, March 31, 2012
John Baldwin writes:
| On Monday, April 02, 2012 7:27:13 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > Doug Ambrisko writes:
| > | John Baldwin writes:
| > | | On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:25:48 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > | | > Sean Bruno writes:
| > | | > | Noting a failure to attac
Doug Ambrisko writes:
| John Baldwin writes:
| | On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:25:48 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| | > Sean Bruno writes:
| | > | Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell
| | > | R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd th
John Baldwin writes:
| On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:25:48 pm Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > Sean Bruno writes:
| > | Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell
| > | R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over
| > |
Doug Ambrisko writes:
| Sean Bruno writes:
| | Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell
| | R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over
| | here for comment.
| |
| | -bash-4.2$ dmesg |grep ipmi
| | ipmi0: KCS mode found at io 0xc
27;t actually wake up the msleep
in ipmi_submit_driver_request. The error being reported is that
the msleep timed out. This doesn't seem to be critical problem
since after this things seemed to work work. I saw this on 9.X.
Haven't seen it on 8.2. Not sure about -current
Jan Mikkelsen writes:
| On 31/03/2012, at 9:21 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
|
| > Jan Mikkelsen writes:
| > | I don't know what changes Sean did. Are they in 9.0-release, or do I
| > | need -stable after a certain point? I'm assuming I should be able to
| > | take src/s
Jan Mikkelsen writes:
| Hi,
|
| On 31/03/2012, at 1:14 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
|
| > John Baldwin writes:
| > | On Friday, March 30, 2012 12:06:40 am Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
| > | ...
| > | > Is this path likely to work out? Any suggestions on where to go from
here?
| > |
|
0: Using MSI
| > mfi0: Megaraid SAS driver Ver 3.00
| > mfi0: Frame 0xff8000285000 timed out command 0x26C8040
| > mfi0: failed to send init command
| >
| > The firmware is package 20.10.1-0077, which is the latest on the LSI
website.
| >
| > Is this path likely to work
ent I'm testing
> on -8 and -9.
Well you get a gold start for actually running it at all, so there you
go. :)
Doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 3/4/2012 2:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2012/3/3 Doug Barton :
>> On 03/02/2012 16:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Try breaking that cycle.
>>
>> ... one of the things I've been asking for years. :)
>>
>> Julian's right though, I think PC-BSD wi
On 03/03/2012 13:03, K. Macy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 03/03/2012 08:53, K. Macy wrote:
>>> a) We as a members of the community are collectively responsible for
>>> the state of FreeBSD. Simply disabling features or removing
>
-current and then have some dedicated development time
where we work together to fix the problems that *we* find in order to
make the project more desktop-friendly overall. I was (figuratively)
laughed out of the room.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized f
1 - 100 of 1203 matches
Mail list logo
