-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
0n Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>Zoran Kolic wrote:
>> > Zoran's comments that http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/ is 'obsolete'
>> > are a bit misplaced regarding older kit that some of us use by cho
0n Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:19:32PM +, Tom Evans wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Logvinov
wrote:
>> ??Use ??chrome --proxy-server="http://proxy:3128/"; :)
>That didn't work either, it would not even make any connections then.
>With '--proxy-server=prox
0n Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:40:28AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
>I've created a patch, merging all kernel event timers related stuff from
>HEAD to 8-STABLE. The only thing I have skipped at this moment was mips
>architecture, because of too big code difference there between HEAD
0n Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:21:12AM -0800, Kirill Yelizarov wrote:
>All my em cards running 8.1 stable don't reply to icmp echo requests
packets larger than 1472 bytes.
>
>On stable 7.2 the same hardware works as expected:
># ping -s 1500 192.168.64.99
>PING 192.168.64.99
0n Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:33:34AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 03:10:06PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>> > We've successfully installed RHEL 5u4 on it, I'll fire that up and post
>> > the boot output shortly.
>> >
>> > Sean
>>
>>
0n Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>On 10/15/10 03:43, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>
>> 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>
>> > 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
>>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic o
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on
8.1-STABLE(r213395) through the
>> use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do
Hi all,
I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395)
through the
use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount as such:
#sshfs usern...@hostname:/home/username local_mountpoint/
This mounts the remote filesystem fine. However, when i e
Hi all,
Without a doubt I can reproduce this panic every single time.
1. Insert UMASS USB Stick
2. mount as msdos
3. umount USB stick
4. remove USB stick
4. some time laster [hours/days] *panic*: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
OS-Version: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 14 12:32:30 CST 2005
[/var/
0n Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 06:59:10AM +1030, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>On 2004.11.12 21:12:12 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>
>> Today I suddenly couldn't log in via ssh to a server I upgraded to
>> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE 4 days ago. When I tried connect to port 22 using
>> tel
0n Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:51:56PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
>FYI, spl*() funtions are all no-ops now. We just have them around to
>remind us that we need to lock certain functions and to document what
>was protected before.
What is meant by "no-ops" ?
- aW
__
0n Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:17:47PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
>On Tuesday 04 January 2005 9:57 pm, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> How can I confirm that ACPI has been setup to do this ?
>
>Hmm, well, the easiest thing to check is to run
>
>sysctl hw.ac
0n Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:50:10PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
>Yes, in FreeBSD 5.3 if ACPI is enabled and working properly, pressing
>the power button will initiate a graceful shutdown (similar to shutdown
>-p). This feature is enabled by default if it is available, so you
>d
0n Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>By the way, you can map a key combination (Ctrl-Alt-Del or
>something else) to the »halt« or »power-down« functions,
>using kbdcontrol, so it's very easy and intuitive to shut
>down the machine properly. See
0n Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:36:56PM +0300, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 04:38:23PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
>> Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>>
>> >I've tried the UPDATING instructions, both locally and remotely (the
>> >latter failed ;-). But really, everyth
0n Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:35:42PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> When 'fishing' for stuff in the kernel source code I find the tags
> files kind of useful. In a kernel build directory (e.g. I usually
> use src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC on a 5.X machine, after config-ing
> GENERIC) afte
ping only tests latency *not* throughput. So it is not really a good test.
- aW
0n Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
[ ... ]
>Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit
PCI
>D
0n Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:37:37PM -0600, Nicolás de Bari Embriz García
Rojas wrote:
Doing all this described on (sec-05) dont work I have allready compile
the kernel with out the device agp, tried Option "NvAGP" "0,1,2,3" and
still having the same results, kernel
From: /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113/doc/README
__
(sec-05) CHOOSING THE AGP GART DRIVER
__
Similar to the NVIDIA Linux Dr
For the benefit of those that are not aware. Can someone please explain what
is meant by 'kernel preemption' and the benefits of it.
Thanks
- aW
0n Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:29:23PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote:
> Thanks
21 matches
Mail list logo
