Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:18:35, netch wrote about "5.4-RC3: "giving up on 3
buffers"":
> I have got system on 5.4-RC3 which stably fails to reboot correctly
> with the message in subject:
Next message after him:
pfs_vncache_unload: 1 entries remaining
After reboot:
WARNING: / was not properly
Hi,
I have got system on 5.4-RC3 which stably fails to reboot correctly
with the message in subject:
After reboot, some file systems (/var and /var2) aren't correctly unmounted.
I can debug it if someone helps in this (what to debug and what to print).
-netch-
Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system
problem in either stable or current":
DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs
DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on
DS> both releases, each claims t
Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 13:52:08, stijn (Stijn Hoop) wrote about "alternate system clock
has died":
SH> I'm getting the message in the subject when I run systat -vm on a lightly
SH> loaded server. Top shows interesting CPU usage %:
SH> CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interr
Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 21:20:32, marck (Dmitry Morozovsky) wrote about "4-stable,
sendmail, and named-authoritative zones":
What `sendmail -d8.8,21.12 -bv [EMAIL PROTECTED]' says?
And whether `echo \$=w | sendmail -bt' says unallowed names?
> There is 4-stable machine with system-default named
Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 22:12:08, mailing (Rick Hoppe) wrote about "Sendmail broken
after upgrade 4.4-RELEASE to 4.5-STABLE":
> Feb 14 21:30:00 ns1 sendmail[105]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): Warning: .cf
> version level (10) exceeds sendmail version 8.11.6 functionality (9)
>
> Some time ago I alread
Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 20:35:42, rrs (Rob Schulhof) wrote about "High interrupt rate":
> I'm puzzled why my system is spending 1% of CPU on system interrupts when
> completely idle. I even with avery thing killed except kernel proceses top
> and vmstat show 0.8% is spent servicing interrupts. A
Hello Juha Saarinen!
Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:27:54, juha (Juha Saarinen) wrote about "RE: poor performance
with FreeBSD and Windows ICS":
> $ make
> Warning: Object directory not changed from original
> /usr/src/share/man/man7
make clean obj && make depend && make all install
/netch
To U
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:10:35, gnb (Gregory Bond) wrote about "Who's HUPing my
daemon?":
Proper daemonization consists of many steps, some of them are:
1) chdir("/"), to prevent staying on file system which must be unmounted.
(But let's consider changing sysctl kern.corefile to absolute path.
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 16:52:18, Antoine.Beaupre (Antoine Beaupre (LMC)) wrote about
"Re: time_t definition is worng":
> Why not make leave it a long on alpha (and IA64) and make it a 'long
> long' on IA32 so that we get rid of the Y38 bug right now? ;)
It will break ABI compatilibity in too ma
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 16:18:08, david (David Wolfskill) wrote about "Re: time_t
definition is worng":
> >Historically people compared time stamps by subtracting one from
> >another.
> Which is a practice that the difftime() function was invented to
> replace.
difftime is for ANSI comp
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
> Once the system comes up multiuser, diagnose and fix mysql problems. For
> future reference, ALWAYS disable startup scripts for third party stuff
> before _starting_ the upgrade. This is especially true for remote upgrades.
The pity moment is that init(8) logic is absol
Mon, May 28, 2001 at 19:10:55, scrappy (The Hermit Hacker) wrote about "machine hangs
when no memory/swap left ...":
> stupid question, but shouldn't there be a mechanism to prevent that?
> something to crash the process or somethign when the machine runs out of
> virtual memory?
This mechani
> kervorkian 187# netstat -rn
> [...]
> 10.10.220/24 link#2 UC 00 de1 =>
> netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
> 10.10.220.60 0:d0:b7:b9:1e:3a UHLW0 167 de1496
> netstat: kvm_read: Bad address
> 10.10.220.70 0:d0:b7:b9:21:3e
Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:41:55, ab (Eugene M. Kim) wrote about "Old compiler
(3.3-stable -> 4->stable)":
> I'm having some hard time getting a machine upgraded from 3.3-stable to
> 4-stable.
It is better now to do binary upgrade from 3.x to 4.3, if your Internet
connection allows to download `
me, especially for tco_forward()
concept?
> Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> > Today, 4.3-RC (RELENG_4, date=2001.04.11.00.00.00) was built and, when
> > new system started:
> > 1) during boot and even before /sbin/init started, "microuptime went backwards"
> > occured t
A few last months, building of 4-stable on 3.4-stable system fails with
=== cut ===
c++ -I/usr/obj/var/REL4/src/i386/usr/include/g++ -O -pipe -I/usr/obj/var/REL4/
src/i386/usr/include -I/var/REL4/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/li
b -I/var/REL4/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -c /var/REL4/sr
ost one is 3.4-stable
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 07:44:05PM +0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> > ===> share/doc/usd/13.viref
> > (cd /m4/REL4/src/share/doc/usd/13.viref/../../../../contrib/nvi/docs/USD.doc/vi.
> > ref; sed -e\ 's:\(\.so[\ \ ][\ \ ]*\)\(vi
18 matches
Mail list logo