Nvidia driver cannot compile on FreeBSD 12.0

2019-03-23 Thread Unga via freebsd-stable
nvidia_acpi.c -o nvidia_acpi.oIn file included from nvidia_acpi.c:12:./os-interface.h:27:10: fatal error: 'stdarg.h' file not found#include          ^~1 error generated. My OS:# uname -aFreeBSD unga 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  amd64 I used to have a previou

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

2013-03-27 Thread Unga
regardless the OS (BSDs, Linux, Windows, Android, etc)? Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

2013-03-27 Thread Unga
- Original Message - > From: Ian Lepore > To: Unga > Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:06 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations > > On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 11:35 -0700, Unga wrote: >> Hi all

FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations

2013-03-26 Thread Unga
regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

pthreads mostly hang when signal

2011-11-09 Thread Unga
ng error in my side or scheduling error or something else? Appreciate very much if FreeBSD guys could help me to solve this issue. Many thanks in advance. Best regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Weird priority for normal

2008-11-22 Thread Unga
gh look but did not see any error. I'm not sure by now is it been fixed. Do others experience it? Best regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscri

Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

2008-10-09 Thread Unga
kernel-specific printf format specifiers. Is that the correct move forward? Best regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

2008-10-07 Thread Unga
7;cvs diff -rFSF'. I need to do more home work before I try your method. Could you kindly confirm it work for you? after applying the patch, does your compilation of gcc complete cleanly? I get errors. Therefore, could you try it please.

Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

2008-10-07 Thread Unga
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-Oct-06 06:19:34 -0700, Unga > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources > are scattered > >over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to &g

Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

2008-10-06 Thread Unga
compared to the original gcc-4.2.1 sources from GNU and post here, I could apply the patch on my side and verify it was done correctly, whether I can compile the FreeBSD kernel or not. Many thanks in advance. Kind regards Unga ___ freebsd

Re: sysinstall compilation issue

2008-08-12 Thread Unga
--- On Tue, 8/12/08, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: sysinstall compilation issue > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 3:28 PM > --- On Fri, 8/8/08, Oliver From

Re: sysinstall compilation issue

2008-08-12 Thread Unga
--- On Fri, 8/8/08, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: sysinstall compilation issue > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Friday, August 8, 2008, 9:36 PM > Unga <[EMAIL PROTEC

sysinstall compilation issue

2008-08-07 Thread Unga
sr/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/../../share/termcap/termcap.src ./rtermcap ansi | file2c "const char termcap_ansi[] = {""' ',0};" What is wrong at my end? Note, I linked the rtermcap with ncursesw libraries, can that be the cause? Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. Kind

bsnmp header files question

2008-08-07 Thread Unga
Hi Could I know on i386 RELENG_7, what Makefiles install following header files: 1) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h 2) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_mibII.h 3) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h Appreciate your reply very much. Kind regards Unga

Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset

2008-07-28 Thread Unga
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Monday, July 28, 2008,

Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset

2008-07-28 Thread Unga
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-stable@freebsd.

Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset

2008-07-28 Thread Unga
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: undefined reference to SYS_cpuset > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Monday, July 28, 2008

undefined reference to SYS_cpuset

2008-07-28 Thread Unga
ultiple routing tables update on 20080724 broken something? Any ideas? Kind regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error [SOLVED]

2008-07-20 Thread Unga
--- On Sun, 7/20/08, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, July 20, 20

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-20 Thread Unga
--- On Sun, 7/20/08, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, July 20, 20

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-19 Thread Unga
--- On Sun, 7/20/08, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error > To: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, July 20, 2008,

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-19 Thread Unga
= 2 (0x2) ls -l /dev/ | grep pty crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 169 Jul 20 10:11 ptyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 171 Jul 20 10:23 ptyp1 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0, 178 Jul 20 10:11 ptyp2 I'm using Expect-5.43.0 compiled from sources. So, it looks like some sort of a misconfiguration. Still investigating. Regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-19 Thread Unga
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error > To: "Unga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Saturday, July

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-18 Thread Unga
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error > To: "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Saturday, July 19, 2

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-18 Thread Unga
Ahh according to the man page its not a sysctl: > kern.pts.max > > man 4 pty for more info. > I use the the original BSD pty. According to the man page kern.pts.max is for SysVR4 pts-like implementation, well, that how I understand. Anyway, I'll give

Re: Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-18 Thread Unga
ay then? 2) Even if ptys are totally dynamic in 7, what is the upper limit and where it is defined? in which source file or header file? Please answer if you know this. I'm really stuck. kind regards Unga ___ freebsd-stable@free

Pseudoterminals increase: compilation error

2008-07-18 Thread Unga
requested pseudoterminals." I tried to recompile the kernel. I have modified the GENERIC as follows: device pty 64 # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) This results a compilation error: config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:268: syntax error *** Error code 1 What is the correct syntax? Ki

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-05-28 Thread Unga
--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 27, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Unga wrote: > > Appreciate if Chuck Swiger could enlighten us > again on > > what priority X run on Mac OSX? realtime or > normal? > > The X11 server seems to run with mildly elevated &

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-05-27 Thread Unga
--- Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When open an pdf has two types of scenarios in > > FreeBSD: > > 1. When X run as a realtime-prio process, X go > mad and > > swallow up almost all of CPU cycle

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-05-25 Thread Unga
--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 23, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Unga wrote: > > When open an pdf has two types of scenarios in > FreeBSD: > > 1. When X run as a realtime-prio process, X go mad > and swallow up > > almost all of CPU cycles, making aud

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-05-23 Thread Unga
--- Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Idle-prio process which generates lot of I/O is > > understandable. > > > > But when you either record or playback audio as > > realtime-prio and you opened up a

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-05-22 Thread Unga
--- Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, but I think there's a > technical > detail that should be mentioned ... > > Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My earlier test shows processes in the normal > category >

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-21 Thread Unga
table for professional audio and video production. Kind Regards Unga Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-20 Thread Unga
0; nc++) ; printf("%d : %.0f\n", i, nc); } } Kind Regards Unga Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobi

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-16 Thread Unga
CPU power and RAM, both 4BSD and ULE schedulers perform well to the extent, the user of the computer is not aware of such a buildworld process is going on. The point I mentioned in my original post is a comparison of the 4BSD to the ULE scheduler. I mentioned the desktop responsiveness of the 4B

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-16 Thread Unga
--- Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:26:05 -0700 (PDT) > Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I listen to FLAC on amarok on professional > headphones > > at the same time browsing web while compiling > 'make >

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-11 Thread Unga
Try the compiling experiment and see if you get the > same effect > as I did. For me it;s a bit win, because I couldnt > use the > desktop when I was compiling code. Swingd and > roundabouts > though - if you dont od big comiles then it may seem > theres no &

Re: sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-11 Thread Unga
with sched_ule, but rather the desktop is bit slow to respond. My point is, the version of the sched_ule in FreeBSD RELENG_7 is old, I like to give it a try with the latest sched_ule to see at least both are equally good on a single processor. The s

sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-10 Thread Unga
users like me who run FreeBSD 7.X (RELENG_7) can give more feedback? Kind regards Unga __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-s

The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System

2008-03-14 Thread Unga
. Edition ISBN-10: 0-201-70245-2 http://www.informit.com/title/0201702452 Many thanks in advance. Kind regards Unga Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE always hang

2007-11-30 Thread Unga
--- Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:42:35 + > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 03:28 -0800, Unga wrote: > > > --- Michael Proto &

Re: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE always hang

2007-11-29 Thread Unga
--- Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unga wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE on Intel P4 3.0GHz, > > 512MB Ram computer. > > > > Its very irritatingly hangs very frequently, more > than > > 10 times a

FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE always hang

2007-11-28 Thread Unga
b. I find it mostly when I try to move the mouse it hangs. Upward and downward cursor keys press and hold also hangs, but not always. These may be just coincidental. How do I find why it hangs? How is the stability of the upcoming 7.0? Best Regards