Re: Segfaults and bus errors in 4.6.2?

2002-10-07 Thread Terry Lambert
Robert Withrow wrote: > Man, am I read in the face!!! > > I just got through writing that I had built a kernel with this: > > :- options DISABLE_PSE > > but I just went and looked and found out I had edited GENERIC but built the > kernel with another config file: [ ... ] > Whoops! > > So i

Re: dhcp problems with my ISP

2002-08-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Bri wrote: > Hi I have a Cable and have a Cable Modem for my internet connection of which > you use dhcp to obtain an IP address great but this only seems to work > successfully on a Windows machine I've registered all the other mac > addresses of unix boxes and Apple macs I have and they seem to

Re: laptop's modem

2002-05-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Do you mean "ltmdm", the Lucent Winmodem driver? > > Correct. [ ... ] > Win2K calls it a LT Win Modem. Definitely a Lucent. > > Did your E700 work with -STABLE? The "ltmdm" thing didn't work > > with some Lucent modems, in the same way the binary only Olicomm > > drive

Re: laptop's modem

2002-05-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Dmitry Shupilov wrote: > > > Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me! > > > I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini > > > PCI. After

Re: laptop's modem

2002-05-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Dmitry Shupilov wrote: > Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me! > I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini > PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out - > system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find > some info abo

Gigabit ethernet card tangential topic

2002-05-14 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew Dillon wrote: > In anycase, my feeling about GigE in general is that it's a great cheap > way to aggregate data on an uplink, or to an NFS server that needs it, > but the incremental cost and hassle factor are still too high to > extend the benefit to generic servers. I re

Re: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE not easily scalable to large servers ... ?

2002-04-24 Thread Terry Lambert
David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Writing a useful (non-"fluff") technical book, optimistically, > > takes 2080 hours ... or 40 hours per week for 52 weeks... a man > > year. > > > > By the time you are done

Re: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE not easily scalable to large servers ... ?

2002-04-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Vallo Kallaste wrote: > You can have up to ~12GB of usable swap space, as I've heard. Don't > remember why such arbitrary limit, unfortunately. Information about > such topics is spread over several lists arhives, usually the > subjects are strange, too.. so hard to find out. As I understand it >

Re: The sendmail discussion...

2002-03-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Nate Williams wrote: > > > (my company demands > > > that all software I write, including in my own free time, is copyright by > > > them) > > > > You need to move to California, where this is against the law. > > Every California company I've worked for has made me sign a statement > with the ab

Re: New sendmail users (was Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from nobody:nogroup to www:www planned)

2002-01-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Paul Fardy wrote: > > For what it's worth, I think that the user: > > > > smmsp Sendmail Mail Submission Protocol > > > > should be changed to: > > > > mspdMail Submission Protocol Daemon > > > > to be agnostic to the program using it. > > But isn't it a Sendmail

Re: New sendmail users (was Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from nobody:nogroup to www:www planned)

2002-01-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: For what it's worth, I think that the user: smmsp Sendmail Mail Submission Protocol should be changed to: mspdMail Submission Protocol Daemon to be agnostic to the program using it. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

Re: fxp SCB timeout problems [FIX]

2001-08-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Tancsa wrote: > > What's being lost > >here, when it is disabled, instead of being handled as the > >card manufacturer expects the OS to handle it? > > From my perspective, negative functionality is being lost. There is a > nice comment in the source code explaining what it is... [ ... ac

Re: fxp SCB timeout problems [FIX]

2001-08-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Tancsa wrote: > >fxp0: port 0xc400-0xc43f mem > >0xd5001000-0xd5001fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci1 > >fxp0: *** DISABLING DYNAMIC STANDBY MODE IN EEPROM *** > >fxp0: New EEPROM ID: 0x49a0 > >fxp0: EEPROM checksum @ 0xff: 0xe441 -> 0xe443 > >fxp0: *** PLEASE REBOOT THE SYSTEM NOW FOR CORRECT

PATCH: partial fix for broken "make release"...

2001-05-02 Thread Terry Lambert
all for -current. Can someone at least apply the patch to RELENG_4??? Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. Index: Makefile =

Re: Dedicated disks (was: Dangerously Dedicated)

2000-11-24 Thread Terry Lambert
. You can always do this with your own tools. The question is whether it should be allowed in sysinstall. So far, it has been nothing but trouble. I think the accessibility to new users is probably the number one consideration. The more likely we are to destroy an existing FS on a us