On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:14:10 Adam Strohl wrote:
>> On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
>> > What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very simple.
>> > Is it just a few people who run into problems like this or is this simply
>>
I'll be glad to run buildworld on one of my machines whenever I get
connection/internet service again. I'm stating this and emphasizing the
previous email because I never had such problems on any of my PPC machines.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Super Bisquit wrote:
> Why not c
Why not compare native builds to tinderbox?
2012/1/4 Dag-Erling Smørgrav
> Garrett Cooper writes:
> > That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox
> > takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data
> > structure change, even a change to a header and C
I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
> freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for
> powerpc/power
