It seems Anshuman Kanwar wrote:
Ehem, this machine is NOT ServerWorks based, its Intel...
> rack2-102.nyc# pciconf -l
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x254c8086 rev=0x01
> hdr=0x00
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x chip=0x25438086 rev=0x01
> hdr=
It seems Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a bug report against BerkeleyDB 4 that may not be BerkeleyDB
> related, but a problem with FreeBSD or specific hardware in general.
>
> Jie Song (CC'd) reported that writing files with BerkeleyDB (no
> threading or something) on his ServerWorks
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> I have been trying out the OnStream DI-30 in STABLE which come up as
> ast0: TAPE at ata1-master using WDMA2
>
> Dump seems to work with it OK in that I can dump a file system and restore
> it OK. But tar does not. I have tried plan old tar and tar with block si
It seems Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> Nov 5 12:35:40 gurney /kernel: FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Sun Nov 5 10:15:56 EST 200
> Nov 14 14:39:32 gurney /kernel: FreeBSD 4.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 13 14:15:20 EST 200
Uhm, seems to me that this is the same source being built or what ??
Upgrade to at least 4.2-RE
It seems [Ivan Debn_r] wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-2 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I'm just looking at the disk partitions, and the first 63 sectors are by
> default marked as unused. So is it really nescessary to have the ofset in
> the ar driver for HPT?
This has been changed in both -curr
It seems Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to my injected debugging message, the first time
> "inb(scp->altioaddr)" was executed in ata_intr(), it returns 0xd0(busy):
Uhm 0xd0 is SERVICE and READY and BUSY, which doesn't make sense...
> /* if drive is busy it didn't interrupt *
It seems Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >The problem is that the altioaddr that the pccard probe sets is
> >wrong, thereby resetting the card and altstat fail.
> >
> >I'll commit a fix as soon as I have it tested some more, but the
> >one phk & I have tried over the phone works
>
> But let me tel
It seems Gerd Knops wrote:
> With these drives and a slightly patched ATA driver (to recognize the
> onboard promise chipset)
You shouldn't need patches with the latest -stable, and -current for
some time now...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
It seems Sergei Vyshenski wrote:
> >The old Intel PIIX is know to have DMA problems, I never intended to
> >support it, but the current code (from luiqi IIRC) was found to be
> >sufficient IF the BIOS did its job right. I seems that we have a
> >BIOS here that doesn't setup things the way they s
It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Have a search through the archives as I think someone else had problems
> with the Fujitsus. What if you disable DMA. Are you actually using the
> drive in Win98 with DMA drivers ? What if go back to PIO mode. Perhaps the
> maintainer can shed light on it ?
10 matches
Mail list logo
