On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:44:53PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
#> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:50AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
#>
#> > The trace doesn't look too wierd, otherwise. There was a warning about
#> > having libm.so.2 and libm.so.3 causing a potential confl
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:44:53PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
#> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:50AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
#>
#> > The trace doesn't look too wierd, otherwise. There was a warning about
#> > having libm.so.2 and libm.so.3 causing a potential confl
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:06:30PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
#> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
#>
#> > Hi guys,
#> >
#> > I'm resending this mail again with the hopes of finding someone who is also
#> > seeing this problem. I know that mail isn't
Hi guys,
I'm resending this mail again with the hopes of finding someone who is also
seeing this problem. I know that mail isn't the best method perhaps, but
before I open a PR, I thought I'd try again...
My last recent update revealed a bug perhaps. I'm now running:
FreeBSD dakota 5.4-PRERELEA
Hi guys,
My last recent update revealed a bug perhaps. I'm now running:
FreeBSD dakota 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #28: Wed Mar 23
20:38:58 CET 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DAKOTA64 amd64
The system seems to have problems with filedescriptors. It's not otherwise
lo
Ventsislav,
Squid is simply growing beyond normal process size limits. The answer to
your problem is easily found on squid-cache.org. See /sys/i386/conf/LINT
especially:
options MAXDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
options DFLDSIZ="(256*1024*102
