Sam Leffler wrote:
> Otherwise I believe I fixed the sparc builds.
I've built it as a module on 6.1PR/sparc64 (as of 09.03.2006) and it
still
shows the same behaviour as the previous build (PR sparc64/94483)
cheers,
s.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
On Thursday 16 March 2006 22:32, Sam Leffler wrote:
> There's something bogus in the hal.o; I will need to figure out what
> happened and respin it. It's not going to happen immediately; sorry.
So it appears. I just got hit by this on -CURRENT as well, with ath_hal
compiled into the kernel. It
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 17:01, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Oops, you were building a module, not adding ath_hal to a kernel
> config file. I will fix the module build but I have no way to test
> if the code works.
I initially tried to build it into the kernel too, but it failed (AFAIR
with missing i
Sam,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:55, Sam Leffler wrote:
> It means the files.sparc64 rules are botched. I just committed the
> changes to head yesterday but you posted to stable@; what version of
> the os are you running? I will mfc the changes to releng6 as soon as
> I get the ok.
Sorry, not
Hi,
I'm having some issues with the newly imported ath_hal module on the
sparc64 architecture:
(/usr/src/sys/modules/ath_hal)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/src/sys/modules/ath_hal
make: don't know how to make
/usr/src/sys/modules/ath_hal/../../co
Thus spoke Noor Dawod:
> Does the new FreeBSD 4.x branch support the Adaptec 7899 dual channel
> Ultra3 card? This is the card installed on the Dell PowerEdge 1400. See:
Yup.
> Also, does FreeBSD support the optional hardware RAID controller
> available for the same PowerEdge machine mentioned a
