.7.8.33877
Wed Mar 4 19:31:31 UTC 2015
tcp4 0 0 1.2.3.4.5666 5.6.7.8.33877 TIME_WAIT
So naturally the server never manages to get "on top of things" due to not
discarding those on time.
Any other ideas and suggestions?
Regards,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at
y accepting
any traffic. I will keep it like that in case further investigation is
required. Please do let me know if there's anything else you'd like to know
from the state of the machine or something I could try.
​Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administr
eedback. Highly appreciated.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Set the storm threshold to 0, that way you disable the check and don't
> have to wonder
> if its a problem :)
>
> Given everything you've told me I'd suspect the switch..
should be another knob to turn -
feel free to suggest it.
Thanks,
Rumen Telbizov
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Make sure you are in slots with enough lanes/bandwidth, the driver should
> complain when loaded
> if you aren't though. Make sure you aren't
kind of tuning would you recommend that I try?
Thanks,
Rumen Telbizov
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> sysctl dev.ix.0 etc...
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am tryin
hanks,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
yourself or do you think it needs to
reworked? Also any plans of incorporating this in -STABLE ?
Again, I'd like to thank everyone who helped here and especially Oleg,
Dmitry and Jack. Thanks guys!
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed
s and
endorse/incorporate
into future FreeBSD releases. From the comments I am not sure if Jack
really approves on
it or there's a better way of fixing things.
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:14:38AM -0700, R
Jack,
Can you reproduce this problem yourself? Does it make sense to experience
this behavior?
Thanks,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> Thanks for the investigation, I guess what I'm wondering the most right
> now is if the patch from
&g
hine with the latest 9.2 and repeat the tests
see what happens.
2. If the previous one fails - I'll try the patch that Oleg sent. Thanks a
lot for providing that patch.
I'll update this list with more findings.
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Jack Vogel wr
Thanks for the patch Oleg.
I'll give it a try but I would also like to hear back from Jack.
Oleg, can you confirm that you're experiencing the exact same
problem/behavior? What kind of switch is connected on the other end?
Thanks,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ole
lem? Any improvements in 9.2-RC4 in this
regards?
Thank you in advance,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
ling list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> "
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Freddie Cash
> fjwc...@gmail.com
>
7;ll finish with it tomorrow and I'll update
the list with my findings. Having a better understanding on *exactly* what
is causing the problem is what I want
to have first and foremost. Hopefully this script will help me.
Thanks to both of you guys.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Apr 10,
nstall
# sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16
# dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/da0 count=1
# dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/da0 skip=1 seek=1024
# reboot
At this point I am contemplating how to evacuate all the data from there or
better yet put some USB flash to boot from.
I could provide further details/execute
uential access.
Another bug they fixed which wasn't too bad but still ... is that each lane
in a multilane cable (8087) to the backplane was reported as a separate
connection so all the disks were visible 4 times (via 4 different expanders)
even though there's only 1 multilane cable c
with SuperMicro backplanes!
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 27.04.2011 16:39, Denny Schierz wrote:
>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 05:57 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
>>
>>> camcontrol reset 0
>>>
>>
ess is the crazy mac
address
change might be exhausting the cpu much faster. I'd be interested to see how
this
affects catalyst - let me know.
Good luck,
Rumen Telbizov
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> I want to bound two e1000 (1Gb/s) channels and use
s a useful idea.
Very interested of what others have done to implement a redundant/failover
ZFS solution.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> my two nodes are running fine with 8.2-stable and the LSI 9200-8e and
> now, I want to bu
e rest of the world.
Alternative to round-robin is only maybe LACP, but it doesn't really cut it
when
it comes to transfers between two nodes only due to the hashing that LACP
uses. Or maybe 10GbE anyone?
Cheers,
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
_
r
compared to the rest of the vdevs. All those were organized in raidz2 = 6 x
8disks.
Anyway ... something to consider in the cases when you don't have or you
don't
want to have a dedicated bunch of disks for the operating system.
Cheers
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
r
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS#head-378d1d7d308d71637a3466a4f98f845aaeaa116a
if you're planning on using ZFS root.
Improvisation in the above process is strongly suggested ;)
I hope this helps a bit.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm new to BSD an
re, I'm
> probably going to have to spring for a separate controller card in the short
> term. :/
>
>- .Dustin
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
>
> > Hello Dustin,
> >
> > I've been testing this SAS2008 LSI chip (on a LSI
nt back to normal - so keep it in mind.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
help and still no
conclusion. It looks like I am using
only one channel.
Anyway this was just my humble attempt to encourage the MFC of this driver.
I think the card is
pretty good. I'd like to hear other people's opinion on this HBA though.
Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbi
John:
Thanks for the information.
Do you think there's any chance for this to happen sonner than 8.3 release?
Sometime during 8.2-STABLE lifespan?
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:17 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:26:12 am Rumen Telbiz
still the case? Do you think we'll have this driver in 8.2?
Thank you,
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
...
Anyway, thank you once again. Highly appreciated. I hope this is a helpful
piece of
discussion for other people having similar problems.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:55 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 16:15, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> > It s
ces) just like you suggested in your previous email!
Let me know if you have any ideas?
All opinions are appreciated!
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:59 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 10/31/2010 15:53, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> > Hi Artem, everyone,
> >
> > Here&
pper.
I still think that if there's a way to edit the cache file and change the
devices that might do the trick.
Thanks for all the help,
Rumen Telbizov
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Rumen Telbizov
> wrote:
> > FreeBSD 8
Thanks Artem,
I'll upgrade to latest stable and zfs 15 tomorrow or Sunday and I'll see if
that makes
it any better. If not I'll also try the chmod operation below.
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll report back here.
Regards,
Rumen Telbizov
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, A
s any
difference.
I wonder if there's a way to fix it over OpenSolaris LiveCD. Somehow load
the gpt labeled partitions and save
the cache file.
Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
only chance at this point would be to somehow manually edit
the zpool configuration, via the zpool.cache file or not, and substitute
mfid with gpt/disk?!
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks,
--
Rumen Telbizov
http://telbizov.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
ren[1]
type='disk'
id=1
guid=16676544025008223925
path='/dev/mfid28p1'
phys_path='/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@1c/pci15d9,c...@0
/s...@1e,0:a'
clues would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> > but only those 3 devices in /dev/gpt and absolutely nothing in
> /dev/gptid/
> > So is there a way to bring all the gpt labeled partitions back into the
> pool
&
can provide any additional information you
may need.
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Thanks Artem,
>
> I am mainly concerned about fixing this immediate problem first and then if
> I
> can provide more information for the deve
rade ZFS to
> a version that is newer than the one FreeBSD supports.
>
> Opensolaris may be able to fix the array. Once it's done, export it,
> boot back to FreeBSD and re-import it.
>
> --Artem
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rumen Telbizov
> wrote:
No ideas whatsoever?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> After a few days of struggle with my degraded zpool on a backup server I
> decided to ask for
> help here or at least get some clues as to what might be wrong with it.
> Here'
whole_disk=0
DTL=269
children[2]
type='disk'
id=2
guid=1189246954957292
path='/dev/gpt/disk-e2:s8'
Thank you everyone for your comments!
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 10/02/10 22:18, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> > pool: tank
> > config:
> >
> > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> > tank ONLINE 0
zfs.arc_max: 4466216960
I think this answers all the questions so far.
Let me know what you think. I might be missing something obvious.
Thank you,
Rumen Telbizov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
7;t make any difference.
Tried percona binary without any luck.
Let me know what additional information would be useful and I'll provide it
here.
Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions.
Cheers,
Rumen Telbizov
___
freebsd-s
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 05:22:31AM -0700, Dan Strick wrote:
> On Sat, 15 May 2004 14:01:45 +0300, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> >>
> > I am running 2 server with serial ata controllers
> > (HighPoint and a builtin one) and so far I had NO problems
> > at all! HighPoint s
ast! My OS is FreeBSD 4.9 (and 4.10-PRERELEASE).
Good Luck
Rumen Telbizov
>
>
>
> _F
>
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
ce recently and in my tests it showed that
machdep.hlt_logical_cpus=0 is better!
A simple ubench (spawning 2 processes) gives better results in 0 mode!
Thank you in advance!
Rumen Telbizov
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
ments are welcome.
Thank you in advance.
Rumen Telbizov
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
46 matches
Mail list logo
