memory using mlo
ckall(): Resource temporarily unavailable
w/ 7-STABLE around Sep 4. I don't put plock = no in amd.conf, so
by default it's plock'ed.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
of 7-STABLE, but can not found a
> report or a solution. Did anyone have the same issue? Thank you very
> much.
>
According to my previous experience, amd 6.1.5 crashes
under low memory situations. Not necessary high load.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
sd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-March/089037.html
>
> I have rolled back the lockd.c to 1.20 in our nfs server and it works
> fine as before.
Add dfr@ to CC list.
I'm curious about this change, could you check what socket bind by
rpc.lockd and rpc.statd before and after lockd. rev 1
E instead
> > of the default BSD scheduler.
> >
>
> What's the advantage of ULE / disadvantage of the default? Is it
> specific to this hardware?
It gives you better performance. You may want to check Kris's slides
http://people.freebs
It's 7.0-RELEASE amd64, GENERIC modulo some devices,
using 4BSD, IPSEC, and IPFW. The backtrace seems related
to softupdate code. This box is just a NFS server that serves
~25 6.x + Linux clients.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
cpuid = 1
KDB:
ut it does not
fail. Nevertheless, I have just removed the duplicate one (actually,
both curs_terminfo and curs_termcap has tputs.3. As we use termcap
in base, so I just removed the one links to curs_terminfo).
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
We have a box running 6.2-RELEASE smoothly, once we boot
with 6.3-RELEASE. It panics in hptmv0, I have kernel dump available.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0xfffb5444efc5
fault code = supervisor read data
ted binary. Everything
will be fine then. Binaries built between 20071025 and 20071030
will be affected by this.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
king.
Something must be changed in the past two years. ;-)
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 10/30/07, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:51 +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > The breakage introduced by MFC of ctype(3) after 2007/10/24 14:23 UTC
> > is now fixed. Make sure you have lib/Makefile rev 1.205.2.4 before u
The breakage introduced by MFC of ctype(3) after 2007/10/24 14:23 UTC
is now fixed. Make sure you have lib/Makefile rev 1.205.2.4 before upgrading
your world. If it breaks already, please follow the instructions in src/UPDATING
to recover.
Sorry for all the troubles.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
On 10
On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/25/07, Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/25/07, Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > My installworld of RELENG_6 from a f
ing entry in
> > UPDATING?
> >
> > regards,
> > Alson
> >
> It is not something you did. I had the same problem and have just
> recovered from it.
Sorry for the trouble, see my HEADSUP message on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 10/25/07, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My installworld of RELENG_6 from a few hours ago failed with this error
> > (from memory):
> > /lib/libncurses.so.6:
ncurses, plus PAM. I had to
> force a reboot via DDB and copy /usr/obj/lib/libc/libc.so.6 to /lib
> using binaries from /rescue to fix it so I could run make installworld
> again.
I will take a look. before that do not upgrade your system.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
>
> I upgraded from RELENG_
On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 1
On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
>> in sys/conf/NOTES:
&
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
> if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
> My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
> Is this stil
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ry.
As kib@ told me, do not install this loader on your disk
which may destroy your data.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from.&q
t to Cc: my reply to the list:
kib@ has real mode BTX code which appears to work with affected systems
of mine, however, the code has not yet made it into CVS. I spliced it
into a 6.2 miniboot ISO and it worked.
It also works on my ThinkPad X60 with 7.x boot cd.
Regard
o use MSI, one MUST set hw.pci.enable_{msi,msix} to
1 in loader.conf as the commit log said.
But from the revision changes that Jason posted, the most
suspicious part is MSI...
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
On 4/10/07, Nikolay Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2007 at 11:48:08 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:21:08AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:49:32AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > > On 4/10/07,
On 4/10/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 02:05:45AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I just merged ncurses 5.6 and wide character support from
> HEAD to 6.x. That means ncurses in 6.x is now up-to-date and
> has wide character support, i.e., ncurs
Hi all,
I just merged ncurses 5.6 and wide character support from
HEAD to 6.x. That means ncurses in 6.x is now up-to-date and
has wide character support, i.e., ncursesw library.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 4/7/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Rong-en Fan wrote:
>> > On 3/12/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-67166
which patches the eeprom. And it solves by problem.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 3/13/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rong-en Fan wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > ncurses in 6.x is pretty old. We have update-to-date ncurses
On 3/12/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> ncurses in 6.x is pretty old. We have update-to-date ncurses in 7.x
> with wide character support now. The patch at
>
>
http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/ncurses/ncursesw-5.6-al
es
made by ru@ recently for src/Makefile.inc1.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the current exp run on pointyhat to be finished.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e boot/ directory out of cd.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
simply GENERIC+QUOTA+SMP.
I also noticed that it is not possible to modify in-use
disk's partition table. There is also a PR 85772 about
it. Can someone comment on it? Thanks.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
wever, the mystery is why ips stops work suddenly. Perhaps, I
tweaked some hardware settings and I forgot it.
On 11/18/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll look at this.
Scott
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading RELENG_6 from Jul 11 to Sep 30 on an i386 box,
&
next few days.
You are the third person to report this panic. (I am one of the other
two.
I reported unp_gc() panic recently. See
"Re: LOR (intr table and sio) and instability" on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jhb@ told me that he also saw this and there is currently no
fix yet.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
dumps on ips(4) and it works.
dumpdev="/dev/ipsd0s1b"
Martin
ips(4) can do kernel dump, but in my case above, ips(4) is already
command timeout mode...
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
n
are welcome.
Thanks,
Rong-En Fan
==
ips0: WARNING: command timeout. Adapter is in toaster mode, resetting to known s
tate
ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes
ips0: syncing config
Sleeping thread (tid 12, pid 14) owns a non-sleepable lock
sched_switch(c5feec00,0,1,8577f833,d14
ne needs more information,
I can reproduce this panic and gather them in ddb. BTW, I used
'call doadump' in ddb, but after rebooting, savecore complains
there is no dump?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
l 'doadump' in ddb, but after rebooting, savecore says there is
no dump there? (i have dump_dev="AUTO"
If you need more information, please let me know.
Thanks,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On 10/18/06, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> Yesterday, I saw my all my nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk.
> I saw the same thing some time ago. I break into ddb and do a
> 'alltrace':
do you have an em or b
ck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk, I can
still login to the system (all exported fs are on an external RAID).
I'm not sure how to trigger this behavior. Any suggestions are
welcome. If there is anything I can provide in ddb to help trace
this down, please let me know..
my case, rpc.lockd dies because
write failed, and then a SIGPIPE generated. Two months ago, bin/97768
is sent and rodrigc@ committed (also MFC'ed in RELENG_6). That PR
ignores SIGPIPE (since the code in server/client already takes care of
write failed case). After I applied this PR, I
had upgraded to 6.1 my network would have
been crippled.
Try 6.1-STABLE, especially make sure you have
$FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/kern.c,v 1.16.2.1 2006/06/02
01:20:58 rodrigc Exp $
for usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/kern.c, and see if this helps.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
__
nd related libraries. I hope there are some
experienced people here can show me which way is most likely to be
included in the base system.
In addition to those issues, I hope some of you can test it and feedback.
I really would like to see ncurses in base is updated in the near future.
Regards,
R
[...]
Hi Konstantin and others,
I'm now running RELENG_6_1 as of Apr 30 04:00 UTC source + your
patch. The nfsd is quite happy! After client's du finishes, it
stays idle as expected (eats 0.00% CPU).
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t this MFC'ed change for RELENG_6_1, please cvsup to
RELENG_6_1 date=2006.04.30.03.57.00. Then you should see it
is
1.80.2.6 2006/03/31 07:39:24 kris
To verify the effect of this revision. Please run RELENG_6_1 with
2006.04.30.03.57.00 and 2006.04.30.04.00.00.
Regards,
rged in
6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want
to try that.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ion back to kernel and you need to break
into ddb again to do another "bt ".
By the way, could you verify that backing out vfs_lookup.c rev 1.90
helps in your situation? If not, maybe we are seeing different problems,
and then I have to figure out how to make my serial console work
here.
On 5/23/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> >>
> >>He
type:=nfs;rhost:=nfs2;rfs:=/nfs2/${host}
If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down. Please
let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump to see what happens
when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do not return anything.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 5/15/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading from 5.5-PRERELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE on one
> nfs server today, I noticed that the load is very high, ranging from 4.x
> to 30.x, de
On 5/15/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading from 5.5-PRERELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE on one
> nfs server today, I noticed that the load is very high, ranging from 4.x
> to 30.x, de
n.ipc.shmall=25600
net.inet.ip.random_id=1
kern.maxvnodes=10
vfs.read_max=16
kern.cam.da.retry_count=20
kern.cam.da.default_timeout=300
Anything that I can provide to help nail this problem down?
Thanks,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
)
only works with apm and no acpi. Of course, you have
to create a partition first (via phdisk(?) aviliable at ibm's site).
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
d).
As far as I can tell, ypwhich -m is also broken on 5.4 and 5.5-PRERELEASE.
I have tested that revision on a 5.5-PRERELEASE machine, it
fixes ypwhich -m. I would like to see this MFC'ed to RELENG_6
and RELENG_5, so the newer releases will have this fixed.
On 4/8/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the webpage [1], 6.1 has been branched on April 5. However,
> > I noticed that there is a tag called RELENG_6_1, not a branch called
> > RELENG_6_1. Fo
me. At least, we have RELENG_X_Y branch before
and RELENG_X_Y_BP tag. Is there any special reason that we have
a tag instead of a branch for 6.1?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/schedule.html
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
On 4/8/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 01:28:55AM -0400, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > On 3/6/06, Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not yet received enough information to track rpc.lockd problem.
m I encountered now is related to rev 1.18. But
it is a report that backout 1.18 really helps.
For record, all my clients involved in this mail are running RELENG_6.
Server is RELENG_5 as of March 9. Only IPv4 here, no IPv6.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freeb
On 4/5/06, Garance A Drosehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:08 PM -0400 4/5/06, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> >I just updated my world from Feb's RELENG_6 as of today. I
> >noticed that the column header of ps's output is changed
> >from upper to lower case.
>
ady MFC'ed).
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(in regression/fsx?), can somebody show how to
reproduce this? We would like to do some tests.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &quo
On 3/16/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, we upgrade a 4.11 box to 6.1-BETA2 by reinstall+newfs everything.
> > After that, we found that if hw.ata.ata_dma=1 at boot, then as soon as it
> > starts fsck -
xt
I did a alltrace in ddb:
http://www.rafan.org/FreeBSD/ata/20060311-dball.txt
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mount_nfs(8)
about the usage of intr and its consequence. So this won't be
happened again.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RIANTS, WITNESS to see if there
are some output. However, I'm afriad that I can not get a
serial console access to these machines (and thus no ddb
output :( ).
Thanks,
Rong-En Fan
On 3/10/06, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading several our nfs clie
works fine. Of all the boxes I mentioned above,
I did not do anything special to kernel config, i.e., they are GENERIC w/o
unnecessary devices and w/ firewal. Basically, I can do anything on these
two boxes (they are not in production mode). Any suggestion are welcome.
Than
i = VOP_STRATEGY(vp, bp);
3690KASSERT(i == 0, ("VOP_STRATEGY failed bp=%p vp=%p",
bp, bp->b_vp));
3691 }
3692
3693void
3694bufobj_wrefl(struct bufobj *bo)
3695{
On 3/10/06, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> forget to men
On 3/10/06, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With INVARIANT, WITNESS enabled, when I tried to ^C
> to exit dd, it panics immediately. Some ddb & kgdb
> messages below (I have KDB_TRACE, KDB_UNATTENDED).
> Core file is available. Any help is appreciated :-)
>
>
st preferred way is to using -S or
comconsole_speed in loader.conf, please update that in Handbook
22.6.5.1 Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed.
Thanks,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 2/21/06, Balgansuren Batsukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We installed FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE and cvsuped to STABLE.
>
> We configured machine as IPFW+NAT and installed SQUID+SQUIDGUARD+DANSGUARDIAN.
>
> It works well under light load, but on heavy load suddenly no response whole
> mach
ww.rafan.org/FreeBSD/x336/
BTW, the SCSI timeout message from dmesg-noapic.txt is a bit wired. If I boot
without verbose message it does not show, everything works great. With
verbose booting,
those messages show up and it takes me a lot of time to get into multiuser mode.
*Xeon with HTT, SMP kernel
is enabled, thus there are 4 logical cpus. For some reasons,
I did not have DDB compiled. The kgdb outputs are enclosed.
If there are people interested to help debug this, I can send
information as request.
Thanks,,
Rong-En Fan
(kgdb and console):
Fatal trap 12: page
On 8/28/05, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I also looked at the dump file, looks like that when calling
> m_copym(), m->m_len is 20, off is 1500, m->m_next is NULL
> After first iteration, m becomes NULL...
>
> #20 0xc051d62f in m_copym (m=0x0, off0=1500,
On 8/28/05, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a panic on an i386 5.4-STABLE around Aug 28 with SMP enabled.
> It has 2 physical CPU with HTT enabled (so, total 4 cpus).
> This is a NFS server only with external scsi raid attached.
>
> The c
ne is interested, I can send any other
information requested.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
[sysctl.conf]
net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
net.inet.udp.recvspace=65536
kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096
kern.maxfiles=65535
kern.ipc.shmmax=104857600
kern.ipc.s
feel free to contact
me :-)
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x1c
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc05123aa
stack pointer = 0x10:0xea39
have similar panics ;-)
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
On 7/29/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > I have a 5.4-p5 running on i386. Got a panic: panic: sbflush_locked: cc
> > 0 || mb 0xc33bf000 || mbcnt 4294967040 It is an web server runn
On 8/1/05, Alexander S. Usov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In just 2 days of waiting I got it, however it looks that it has fired in a
> bit different place.
>
> (kgdb) bt
> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159
> #1 0xc0513899 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:410
> #2 0xc0513ede in pa
On 7/29/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > I have a 5.4-p5 running on i386. Got a panic: panic: sbflush_locked: cc
> > 0 || mb 0xc33bf000 || mbcnt 4294967040 It is an web server running
> > Apache and Postfix as a b
e74aed48) at ithread_loop+0x159
fork_exit(c049c138,c3094c80,e74aed48) at fork_exit+0x75
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
--- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xe74aed7c, ebp = 0 ---
db> ps
61 c311ce200 0 0 204 [CPU 3] swi1: net
Regards,
On 7/19/05, Alexander Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If you unload kernel and load it again at boot manually, can 335 boot?
> >I have one 336 with 5.4 that must use this trick to boot, otherwise
> >it hangs after ipfw2 initialized. On the other hand, I have 3 335 installed
> >with 5.4 running
, I have 3 335 installed
with 5.4 running SMP smoothly.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 6/20/05, Juraj Lutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/14/05, Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Recently, one of our 5.3-p16/i386 machine got frequenctly hang. Details,
> >
> > 1. I can switch vty, but can't
machine,
after *foreground* fsck, when it enters multiuser, after the login prompt, I got
another hang. But this time, I can't break into ddb.. only solution is the
power cycle.
If you need more informations, please let me know :-)
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
__
ebp = 0 ---
The system disk is on ips(4) which does not support dump in 5.3
(supportted in 5.4). So, there is no dump available. I don't exactly
know what kind of accessing pattern causes this. Therefore, no idea
where to start at. Wonder if this can be fixed or so.
Cheers
On 4/16/05, Anders Nordby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:27:11PM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > I'm using a Pentium Xeon 3.2G * 2 running 5.3/5.4 amd54 RELEASE.
>
> That's a strange combination. Don't use FreeBSD/amd64 w
here:
http://rafan.infor.org/tmp/5.4-hang/
I executes ps, show threads, show lockedvn.
when console hangs, serial console does not response, front console,
I can use alt+f? to switch vty, caps/numlock led is fine, but keyboard does
not response. can break to ddb.
any suggestions?
Regards,
R
On Apr 11, 2005 3:16 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have twice so far had the kernel syslog a stack backtrace with no
> other information. Inspection of the kernel source, to the best of my
> limited understanding, suggests that getdirtybuf() was handed a buffer
> with
possibility to run this card?
You have to install a 5-STABLE or manually get following files
src/sys/dev/bge/*
src/sys/dev/mii/miidevs
src/sys/dev/mii/brgphy.c
and recompile kernel.
without those two mii files, you can only run 100-baseTX.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
_
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:36:25 -0800 (PST), Doug White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Rong-En Fan wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
> > and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a
wapper
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
f007b7d4000 b19740000 0 1 0004200 [SLPQ
wait 0xff007b7d4000][SLP] init
0 8051e580 805f50000 0 0 200 [SLPQ
sched 0x8051e580][SLP] swapper
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
0xcfffd000-0xcfffdfff irq 38 at
device 14.0 on pci3
ips0: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xcfffd000
ips0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ips0: logical drives: 1
ips0: Logical Drive 0: RAID5 sectors: 430116864, state OK
ipsd0: on ips0
ipsd0: Logical Drive (21
f mem
0xfeb78000-0xfeb7bfff irq 5 at device 9.0 on pci0
skc0: 3Com Gigabit NIC (3C2000)
sk0: on skc0
sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0a:5e:19:b6:3c
Any suggestion and kernel debugging I would like to try.
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
96 matches
Mail list logo
