Portsnap no updates since 3/31/2021 ?

2021-04-06 Thread Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable
I have several servers running 11.4 and 12.2 that do nightly portsnap updates and the last time they've seen anything new is 3/31/2021, since then, nothing. This seems highly unusual since seems like there was always SOMETHING updated daily now nothing. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzo

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC5 Now Available

2021-04-05 Thread Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable
I don't know, ask yourself that, you did the same thing On 4/4/21 6:21 PM, Glen Barber wrote: Is it necessary to quote the*entire* email (including checksums)? Glen Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity and/or typos. ___ freebsd-stable

Re: ZFS...

2019-05-02 Thread Robert Blayzor
On 4/29/19 8:41 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> 2) Backups are essential with any filesystem, not just ZFS. After >> all, no amount of RAID will protect you from an accidental "rm -rf /". That's what snapshots are for! ;-) -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://inoc.net

igb now em driver in FreeBSD 12.0

2019-01-31 Thread Robert Blayzor
Reading the release notes, the igb driver has been merged into the Intel em driver so that should be added to custom kernels. No problem. Question is, when the system reboots, are the NIC devices going to come up with "emX" now or will they remain "igbX" ? Kind of important to know on remote upgr

Re: Clock occasionally jumps backwards on 11.1-RELEASE

2018-01-23 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:07 PM, Alan Somers wrote: > > * Sometimes the jumps happen immediately after ntpd adds a new server to > its list, but not always. > > * I'm using the default ntp.conf file. > > * ntpd is running on both, and it should be the only process touching the > clock. I have a

Re: CARP master election changed in 11.0 ?

2016-12-03 Thread Robert Blayzor
Dec 1, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > Did something change between 10.x and 11.0 with carp MASTER election and > advskew? > > I have several 10.3 servers where the master is elected based on the member > with the LOWEST advskew. > > From a pair of 10.3

CARP master election changed in 11.0 ?

2016-12-01 Thread Robert Blayzor
Did something change between 10.x and 11.0 with carp MASTER election and advskew? I have several 10.3 servers where the master is elected based on the member with the LOWEST advskew. From a pair of 10.3 servers: vlan: 100 parent interface: lagg0 carp: MASTER vhid 10 advbase 1

Re: LAGG and Jumbo Frames

2016-09-20 Thread Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable
If your lag interface is up, what’s not working? Does something like this work? ping -D -s 8972 and then this not? ping -D -s 8972 If your firewall is on the LAN side supporting jumbo frames ok, but not WAN side, then the router will have to fragment all of the packets. (unless DF bit i

Re: Failed to write core file (error 14)

2016-05-20 Thread Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable
On May 19, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Erik wrote: > > This sounds like: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204426 > and > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204764 > > > This problem exists since 10.2. > 10.1 is fine. The bug actually exists in 10.1 as well, at least

FreeBSD STABLE_10 (10.3) - lots of IPv6 connections in CLOSED state

2016-05-05 Thread Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable
Started seeing a ton of these in dmesg: sonewconn: pcb 0xf8001570f188: Listen queue overflow: 301 already in queue awaiting acceptance (41 occurrences) sonewconn: pcb 0xf8001570f188: Listen queue overflow: 301 already in queue awaiting acceptance (45 occurrences) sonewconn: pcb 0xf80

Re: ZFS out of swap space

2015-03-25 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Mar 25, 2015, at 11:08 AM, armonia wrote: > -- Hello. Please help . I mirror ZFS 9.3 , after an active it by using mysql > read \ write from an external script something broken. The operating system > is not loaded at the time of "Mount local filesystems" > > pool consists of a mirror (raid

Re: pxeboot with jumbo frame network

2012-07-24 Thread Robert Blayzor
s already setup and running. But if the client boots and it's not jumbo frame enabled, TFTP will surely hang on getting the PXEboot as the server will be trying to send 9K UDP frames to a client that's probably defaulted to 1500. If there is a DHCP option to set the client MTU, I&#x

pxeboot with jumbo frame network

2012-07-23 Thread Robert Blayzor
seemingly only supporting an MTU of 1500. I know we can set the MTU later (post boot) on the diskless machines, but it doesn't seem we can run a higher MTU on the TFTP server as we'd have TFTP UDP traffic with mis-matched frame sizes at that point. -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rb

Re: em0 watchdog timeouts

2009-10-05 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Rudy wrote: Today, I set net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0 and I'll see if that helps. I have a feeling that isn't related to the NIC at all, but I'm not sure what else to try. Just curious, have you tried (or are you using) device polling? -- Robert Bla

Re: FreeBSD and iSCSI for disks.

2009-04-08 Thread Robert Blayzor
unately due a time constraint we had to move the clients to CentOS 5.2/5.3 and things have been very good so far. I was hoping that FreeBSD's iSCSI support was a bit more solid, or at least hoping that the (isp) driver had support for the QLogic iSCSI HBA's... no luck. YM

Re: FreeBSD-6.x/7.x 1000BaseTX connection problem

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Blayzor
de in the last 8-10 years. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblay...@inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Robert Blayzor
was just ntpd and apache with mpm_worker & threads. Since ULE is now default in 7.1 and not in 7.0, perhaps you can try that? -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblay...@inoc.net http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@

BOOTP and no default route

2008-06-09 Thread Robert Blayzor
k and was wondering if there was a BOOTP option or kernel tweak that can be done to tell the BOOTP client not to use proxy-arp. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
l, but it's a good starting point. The other half of the story however is if it's that easy to hose up TCP sockets on a server, that's a bigger problem IMHO. :-/ -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
possible it's something broken in freshclam where it's failing to deal with a network failure properly -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
tcpdrop seems to at least put a band-aid on things, so I don't have to reboot now. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
On May 30, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Tod McQuillin wrote: This relies on tcpdrop, included as /usr/sbin/tcpdrop on FreeBSD 6.x; you may need to install it from a port on FreeBSD 4.x. Thanks, that seems like a reasonable "band aid" for now. Worked perfectly. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
I believe they have "half closed" timers just for this purpose... Perhaps a kernel tunable knob would be a nice option/fix/hack also. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-s

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
l the rules, just the TCP based ones for the web server. I don't have an outbound send restriction. I believe I have a: permit ip from me to any out In there somewhere! ;-) -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
ng on the box. Why not? -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
to running some flavor of Linux 2.6 (*sob*). -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
leted just fine. I just see these FIN_WAIT_1 connections build up over time until the server runs out of socket space and then things just stop working. Only way to correct it seems to reboot the server... even under RELENG_7_0 so the upgrade from 4_11 did not fix the problem. --

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
.33379 > 1.1.1.1.80: . ack 0 win 0 I'm finding several of these sessions doing the same exact thing -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
;ll try dumping one of those sessions and see -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
several hours, if not infinite. Nonet he less, I have a new server up running 7.0-p1, I'll be pumping a lot of traffic to that box soon and I'll see how that makes out. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
so I'm going to give that a go. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
not until 7? -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
ame ruleset number... Right, I have a : 00100 allow tcp from any to any established in there as well, but noted on the later part. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.o

Sockets stuck in FIN_WAIT_1

2008-05-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
aseTX ) Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: NFS and /etc/exports

2008-04-14 Thread Robert Blayzor
g the ``fragments dropped due to timeout'' value on the server instead of the client. Note that both the -r and -w options should only be used as a last ditch effort at improving performance when mounting servers that do not support TCP mounts." -- Robert Blayzo

Re: NFS and /etc/exports

2008-04-14 Thread Robert Blayzor
v3,-w=32768,-r=32768,rw,noauto 0 0 build:/usr/obj /usr/objnfs tcp,intr,nfsv3,-w=32768,-r=32768,rw,noauto 0 0 Are -r and -w really needed/useful for TCP mounts? -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ Mac

Re: Freebsd 6.2 and booting from iSCSI

2007-10-07 Thread Robert Blayzor
s in block mode instead of file > mode. man diskless As for #3 you can do this with a software initiator once the system boots. -- Robert Blayzor INOC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/ telnet: Unable to connect to remote host:

Strange NFS Client issue

2007-03-27 Thread Robert Blayzor
nt/optnfs -T,-L,-b,-i,rw 0 0 Not sure if it's a NFS client side bug, but it sure seems so -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292A 8580 500E 66F9 0BFC YOUR

Re: 6.x from i386 to amd64

2006-10-31 Thread Robert Blayzor
of the ports we really need and all of them don't seem to have a problem being installed under amd64. I'm mostly interested in running amd64 on higher end hardware that doesn't have an issue of addressing 4GB or more of RAM. The PAE capability on i386 still seems to be a bit

6.x from i386 to amd64

2006-10-31 Thread Robert Blayzor
Is there a way to upgrade/move an already installed i386 installed 6.1 machine to amd64 without completely reinstalling? Is there a procedure to do so? -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1

Re: iSCSI HBAs

2006-09-16 Thread Robert Blayzor
skless as well using the same iSCSI system. I agree that diskless is a nice system to consider, and it's one of our alternate choices, but we do have some applications, virtual servers, etc, which do not support running in native FreeBSD diskless fashion. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblay

Re: iSCSI HBAs

2006-09-16 Thread Robert Blayzor
ver, I'd like to stay with FreeBSD, but sometimes it's lack of support for new server beneficial drivers make that choice hard to make. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292A 8

iSCSI HBAs

2006-09-15 Thread Robert Blayzor
Anyone know if there is a working driver for either the QLogic QLA4050C or Adaptec 7211C iSCSI HBAs? I know there is a software based initiator in the works, but having a driver for the iSCSI HBA's would provide a great alternative to running diskless or FC SAN. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH

Sun X86 servers

2006-07-22 Thread Robert Blayzor
re if that's changed (or changing). What about network controllers? Please contact me off-list (unless others are interested as well). TIA! -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292

Dell PowerEdge 1855

2005-03-16 Thread Robert Blayzor
othing in the latest releases, 4.10+ and 5.3. Can anyone share their experiences with performance and stability on these machines? TIA -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/ Key fingerprint = 1E02 DABE F989 BC03 3DF5 0E93 8D02 9D0B CB1A A

Re: perl 5.8.5 on freebsd 4.10

2004-11-11 Thread Robert Blayzor
EASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 #15: Mon Aug 2 16:14:59 EDT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ICARZ i386 cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 make install clean or portupgrade perl5* Both of those work fine for me. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: http://ww

RE: RE: Swap_pager error

2002-06-04 Thread Robert Blayzor
ind a firewall, we're going to go ahead and disable the security check all together. I'm hoping that this will provide a work around for this "loading" issue. If I can be any help to the core team to debug this problem, I'll do my best to do what I can. -- Robert Blayzor,

RE: Swap_pager error

2002-05-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
array alarm will sound. The array controller shows no problems at all with the disk, and I have no red lights indicating a bad drive. Just seems rather strnage. I'll try doing the dd later at a slower time and let you know how I make out. Thanks again! -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [